2019
DOI: 10.3390/en12040746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation Model for the Scope of DC Interference Generated by Stray Currents in Light Rail Systems

Abstract: Electrochemical corrosion caused by stray currents reduces the lifespan of buried gas pipelines and the safety of light rail systems. Determining the scope of stray current corrosion will help prevent the corrosion of existing buried pipelines and provide an effective reference for new pipeline siting. In response to this problem, in this paper the surface potential gradient was used to evaluate the scope of stray current corrosion. First, an analytical model for the scope of the stray current corrosion combin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When only TPSs are equipped with track voltage measurement points, not only are such points quite sparse (separated, e.g., by 2–4 km) but readings are taken in front of the TPS, where the track voltage change is the least (the track resistance from the power supply point is minimal), with an arguable representativeness and comprehensiveness of such track voltage monitoring. This is also confirmed by [ 4 ], Figure 3 , where the maximum stray current (at train position) is minimal when the train passes in front of the TPS. When VLDs are located at all stations (e.g., for electrical safety reasons), then the density of the measurement points is increased and track voltage is monitored about every 0.6–1.2 km.…”
Section: Stray Current Monitoring Systemsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When only TPSs are equipped with track voltage measurement points, not only are such points quite sparse (separated, e.g., by 2–4 km) but readings are taken in front of the TPS, where the track voltage change is the least (the track resistance from the power supply point is minimal), with an arguable representativeness and comprehensiveness of such track voltage monitoring. This is also confirmed by [ 4 ], Figure 3 , where the maximum stray current (at train position) is minimal when the train passes in front of the TPS. When VLDs are located at all stations (e.g., for electrical safety reasons), then the density of the measurement points is increased and track voltage is monitored about every 0.6–1.2 km.…”
Section: Stray Current Monitoring Systemsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…(3) Output noise not specified. (4) Uncertainty mainly influenced by the offset temperature coefficient. (5) The "rated insulation voltage 50 Vrms" statement in probe datasheet [35]…”
Section: Current Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If a vehicle moves at uniform speed or decelerates without the possibility for regenerative braking (return of electricity to the supply grid using engine as generator during braking activity [16]), its electricity consumption will be minimum, and hence stray currents will also be minimum. On the other hand, the consumption of electricity increases with acceleration, which will result in higher stray current values [17,18]. When a vehicle accelerates, the quantity of stray currents will also depend on vehicle acceleration rate, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In floating system, during return of electricity from the vehicle to the electrical substation, the electric voltage in the rail will appear as positive as the soil in near the rail vehicle, and negative in the vicinity of the electrical substation. The distribution of voltage along the rails will define points where stray currents will occur [17,18]. GRAĐEVINAR 72 (2020) 7, 593-606 Katarina Vranešić, Stjepan Lakušić, Marijana Serdar…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%