2017
DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.0000.2865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation metrics in science: current status and prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The SJR index was introduced in 2008 and is available in open access 23 . An upward trend was observed in relation to this metric in four of the six journals analyzed since their indexing in Scopus.…”
Section: Journalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SJR index was introduced in 2008 and is available in open access 23 . An upward trend was observed in relation to this metric in four of the six journals analyzed since their indexing in Scopus.…”
Section: Journalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The REEUSP (A2) has a value of 0.257 and the RLAE (A1) has a value of 0.394. [9][10] As for the object of study, it was evident that they were quite different. It is highlighted that the evaluation of sterilization quality was the most studied theme (24.07%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variety of data types on scientific and technical international cooperation is significant and reaches several hundred titles [7][8][9]. This raises the dilemma of choosing a basic set: a broad list facilitates a more detailed assessment of individual participants of international activities, but makes it difficult to compare with other actors in international scientific and technical cooperation, as most data values, and hence the indicators developed based on them, may be uncertain, due to unavailability of data.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%