Generalisation of Geographic Information 2007
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008045374-3/50007-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation in the Map Generalisation Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two generalization operations modify the conceptual nature of representations and must be guided by semantics, not geometry [11] [2] [16] [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These two generalization operations modify the conceptual nature of representations and must be guided by semantics, not geometry [11] [2] [16] [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mackaness [9] states "ultimately the results of generalisation do manifest themselves through the manipulation of geometric primitives. But current thinking argues that the reasoning behind those manipulations needs to be based on the analysis of the context."…”
Section: Generalization Of Cartographic Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Threshold values for average distribution angle change are dependent on the number of buildings in the zone. More detailed examination of the evaluation of map generalisation can be found in Bard (2004) and Mackaness and Ruas (2007).…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Spatial Constraints and Qualitativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality measures in the context of automated generalization can fulfill the three tasks formulated by Mackaness and Ruas [31]: evaluation for tuning, evaluation for controlling the generalization process during generalization and evaluation for assessing the quality of generalized data after generalization. We used them for all of these purposes.…”
Section: Definition Of a Geometric Quality Measurementioning
confidence: 99%