2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2019.8803606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation Framework for 360-Degree Visual Content Compression with User View-Dependent Transmission

Abstract: Immersive visual experience can be obtained by allowing the user to navigate in a 360-degree visual content. These contents are stored in high resolution and need a lot of space on the server to store them. The transmission depends on the user's request and only the spatial region which is requested by the user is transmitted to avoid wasting network bandwidth. Therefore, storage and transmission rates are both critical. Splitting the rates into storage and transmission has not been formally considered in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8, we show the results obtained for the RitualDance sequence, for four different values of QP ∈ {22, 17, 32, 37} and for the requested length = 60. We compute the costs (Storage S, Transmission R, and the sum cost F = S +λR as proposed in [3]) for both strategies (optimal We conduct the experiments described above for different sequences from the MPEG common test conditions. We evaluate the rate-distortion performance for the two schemes (naive and proposed) and compare them by computing the Bjontegaard Delta (BD-rate) bit rate saving as classically done in video compression.…”
Section: B Real Dataset: Videomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8, we show the results obtained for the RitualDance sequence, for four different values of QP ∈ {22, 17, 32, 37} and for the requested length = 60. We compute the costs (Storage S, Transmission R, and the sum cost F = S +λR as proposed in [3]) for both strategies (optimal We conduct the experiments described above for different sequences from the MPEG common test conditions. We evaluate the rate-distortion performance for the two schemes (naive and proposed) and compare them by computing the Bjontegaard Delta (BD-rate) bit rate saving as classically done in video compression.…”
Section: B Real Dataset: Videomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…compares the costs (Storage S, Transmission R, and the sum cost F = S +R as proposed in[3]) for both strategies (optimal vs most popular selection). In this experiment, we choose to show two results of (2e) fixed = 0.7 with α ∈ {0.1, 0.2, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now discuss the performance of the different coders in terms of rate and storage performance. In a previous work [29], a weighted Bjontegaard metric is introduced, in which the weight λ balances the relative importance between the rate and the storage, as a function of the application:…”
Section: Analysis Of the Rate-storage Trade-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comes however with a small storage size overhead. In order to evaluate its impact, we rely on a comparison methodology proposed in [17], where the Bjontegaard metric is computed on the curve (P SN R, R + λS), for different values of λ. Results are shown in Table I.…”
Section: R(t ) =mentioning
confidence: 99%