1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-6054(97)89509-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Évaluation des résultats des réparations tendineuses des doigts longs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients were reviewed 16.1 months in average postsurgery (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). No infection occurred; none of the grafted fingers experienced any tenolysis, arthrodesis, or secondary amputation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients were reviewed 16.1 months in average postsurgery (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). No infection occurred; none of the grafted fingers experienced any tenolysis, arthrodesis, or secondary amputation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%