2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Évaluation des états mentaux à risque de transition psychotique : validation de la version française de la CAARMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, CAARMS has been translated into several languages and is the psychometric instrument used most frequently to diagnose ultra‐high‐risk (UHR) (Krebs et al, ). Individuals with sub‐threshold clinical features, such as attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS) or brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS), associated with a significant decline in global functioning in the presence of genetic risk factors ( Trait ), are clinically grouped under the term “ultra‐high risk (UHR).” Other terms, such as “clinical high risk (CHR)” or “at‐risk mental states (ARMS)”, are also used (Shaikh et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, CAARMS has been translated into several languages and is the psychometric instrument used most frequently to diagnose ultra‐high‐risk (UHR) (Krebs et al, ). Individuals with sub‐threshold clinical features, such as attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS) or brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS), associated with a significant decline in global functioning in the presence of genetic risk factors ( Trait ), are clinically grouped under the term “ultra‐high risk (UHR).” Other terms, such as “clinical high risk (CHR)” or “at‐risk mental states (ARMS)”, are also used (Shaikh et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were recruited through the French ICAAR cohort (PHRC AOM-07-118, promoted by Hôpital Sainte-Anne) among help-seeking individuals (16 to 30 years old) consecutively referred to the Adolescent and Young Adult Assessment Centre (Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France) between 2009 and 2014 ( 23 ). All help-seeking individuals were examined at baseline and after 1 year follow-up with the Comprehensive Assessment of at-risk mental state, CAARMS ( 24 ), in its translated version ( 25 ), by specifically trained psychiatrists. After baseline assessment, a consensus meeting for best estimated diagnosis was held, and help-seekers were classified as at-risk for psychosis stage IA or stage IB according to the staging model distinction ( 26 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion criteria were global functioning alterations (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale score <70) during the past year, associated with psychiatric symptoms and/or subjective cognitive complaints. All participants were examined by specifically trained psychiatrists, using a translated French version 13 of the Comprehensive Assessment for at-risk mental states (CAARMS 14 ). Best-estimate diagnoses were allocated at a subsequent consensus meeting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%