Évaluation de la satisfaction des patients ayant bénéficié d'une anesthésie locorégionale par bloc nerveux périphérique : étude bicentrique sur 314 cas

Montenegro, A.; Pourtalés, M.-C.; Greib, Nicolas; End, E; Gaertner, Élisabeth; Tulasne, PA; Pottecher, T.

doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2006.02.018

Cited by 16 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, we identified a number of the questionnaires that were developed in countries that did not have English as the first language; their validity after translation has not been established. 18,22,48,58,71,72,79 Only one instrument developed in a non-English-speaking country (the Leiden Perioperative care Patient Satisfaction questionnaire) has been validated after translation into English. 57 The optimal timing for completing a satisfaction questionnaire for patients undergoing anesthesia is also not clear.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regional anesthesia is gaining popularity, partly due to improvements in safety and success attributed to ultrasound-guided techniques. 83 Our review identified only one tool developed for measuring patient satisfaction after regional anesthesia; 22 further evaluation of this measure would be of value. Satisfaction surrounding the birth of a child is a complex and emotive subject; for this reason, a tool specifically assessing maternal satisfaction with the anesthetic care would be invaluable.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although there were many studies which included satisfaction with general and regional anesthetics, we could find only one French article, which used a psychometric development and evaluation process, to construct a questionnaire measuring satisfaction with regional anesthesia in the nonobstetric setting. 22 Despite a growing literature evaluating the efficacy and outcomes of regional anesthesia, this instrument has subsequently been used in only one other study. 23 This lack of validated tools for measuring satisfaction with regional anesthesia was also reported by Wu et al 15 in their systematic review of this field of practice.…”

Section: Regional Anesthesia (Table 3)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Patient-Satisfaction Measures in Anesthesia

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patient satisfaction is an important measure of the quality of health care and is used as an outcome measure in interventional and quality improvement studies. Previous studies have found that there are few appropriately developed and validated questionnaires available. The authors conducted a systematic review to identify all tools used to measure patient satisfaction with anesthesia, which have undergone a psychometric development and validation process, appraised the quality of these processes, and made recommendations of tools that may be suitable for use in different clinical and academic settings. There are a number of robustly developed and subsequently validated instruments, however, there are still many studies using nonvalidated instruments or poorly developed tools, claiming to accurately assess satisfaction with anesthesia. This can lead to biased and inaccurate results. Researchers in this field should be encouraged to use available validated tools, to ensure that patient satisfaction is measured and reported fairly and accurately.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Regional Anesthesia (Table 3)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patient-Satisfaction Measures in Anesthesia

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our initial hypothesis was that we would find quality in a single paper that defined rates of various regional anaesthesia-related complications as individual outcome indicators [37]. However, the other outcome indicators collected covered other aspects of patient outcomes, such as three detailed and validated patient satisfaction scales developed for regional anaesthesia [23,38,39] and other evaluation tools based on provider ratings of procedural success [35,36].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regional anaesthesia quality indicators for adult patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery: a systematic review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Improvement in healthcare delivery depends on the ability to measure outcomes that can direct changes in the system. An overview of quality indicators within the field of regional anaesthesia is lacking. This systematic review aims to synthesise available quality indicators, as per the Donabedian framework, and provide a concise overview of evidence‐based quality indicators within regional anaesthesia. A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane from 2003 to present, and a prespecified search of regional anaesthesia society websites and healthcare quality agencies. The quality indicators relevant to regional anaesthesia were subdivided into peri‐operative structure, process and outcome indicators as per the Donabedian framework. The methodological quality of the indicators was determined as per the Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine's framework. Twenty manuscripts met our inclusion criteria and, in total, 68 unique quality indicators were identified. There were 4 (6%) structure, 12 (18%) process and 52 (76%) outcome indicators. Most of the indicators were related to the safety (57%) and effectiveness (19%) of regional anaesthesia and were general in nature (60%). In addition, most indicators (84%) were based on low levels of evidence. Our study is an important first step towards describing quality indicators for the provision of regional anaesthesia. Future research should focus on the development of structure and process quality indicators and improving the methodological quality and usability of these indicators.

show abstract

“…Moreover, nervous blocks delay the onset of pain and leave the child and their family on their own to confront pain in an outpatient setting, usually the same night after surgery. 25 Intra-articular local anesthetic injections combined with cryotherapy have proven to be efficient in ACL surgery. In 1996, Brandsson et al 26 compared three randomized groups receiving a different postoperative treatment after ACLR.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Day surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children: A prospective study on feasibility and satisfaction

Barbier

N’Dele

Bennis

et al. 2019

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of day surgery anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in children. Our hypothesis was that proper patient selection, adequate information and a streamlined clinical pathway would allow for a safe and satisfactory procedure. Methods A total of 20 patients, seven girls and 13 boys, who underwent outpatient ACLR at mean age of 14 years (8 to 16) were included in this single institution prospective case series. Surgery took place under simple general anesthesia while analgesia protocol combined local anesthesia, oral analgesics for the postoperative period and compressive cryotherapy. The main failure criterion was the inability to return home the day of surgery or the need for rehospitalization during the first week after discharge. Secondary evaluation parameters were the rate of postoperative complications, postoperative pain, quality of life (QOL) and patients’ satisfaction outcome questionnaire (PSOQ) at postoperative day 1, 7 and 31. Results Of the 20 patients included, only one failed the ambulatory mode. The mean PSOQ score was, respectively for children and parents, 91.4% and 90.7% at day 7 and 94.6% and 95.7% at one month. Postoperative QOL at day 7 was very satisfying for all patients. Two minor early complications were reported. Both of the late complications, which included one partial wound dehiscence and one persistent knee swelling, resolved spontaneously. Conclusion This study indicates that, in a targeted and well-informed population, day surgery for children ACLR yields high level of patient and family satisfaction in a safely manner. Level of evidence IV, prospective case series.

show abstract

Évaluation de la satisfaction des patients ayant bénéficié d'une anesthésie locorégionale par bloc nerveux périphérique : étude bicentrique sur 314 cas

Cited by 16 publications

References 20 publications

Patient-Satisfaction Measures in Anesthesia

Patient-Satisfaction Measures in Anesthesia

Regional anaesthesia quality indicators for adult patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery: a systematic review

Day surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children: A prospective study on feasibility and satisfaction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About