2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-009-3551-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and visualization of the percolating networks in multi-wall carbon nanotube/epoxy composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
50
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical interpretation of the critical exponent t is more complex, and still a matter of controversy, as stated in a recent review by Bauhofer and Kovacs [10]. This exponent is frequently associated to the system dimensionality, with values of t ≈ 1.3 (or slightly higher) representing a two-dimensional network and t ≈ 2 (or slightly higher) a threedimensional one [10,16,20,25]. However, the use of a scaling law for statistical percolation is limited to a concentration range very close to the percolation threshold and the use of this law to extract geometrical information about the CNT network from experimentally determined values of t is controversial, as stated by several authors [10,18,20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The physical interpretation of the critical exponent t is more complex, and still a matter of controversy, as stated in a recent review by Bauhofer and Kovacs [10]. This exponent is frequently associated to the system dimensionality, with values of t ≈ 1.3 (or slightly higher) representing a two-dimensional network and t ≈ 2 (or slightly higher) a threedimensional one [10,16,20,25]. However, the use of a scaling law for statistical percolation is limited to a concentration range very close to the percolation threshold and the use of this law to extract geometrical information about the CNT network from experimentally determined values of t is controversial, as stated by several authors [10,18,20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This exponent is frequently associated to the system dimensionality, with values of t ≈ 1.3 (or slightly higher) representing a two-dimensional network and t ≈ 2 (or slightly higher) a threedimensional one [10,16,20,25]. However, the use of a scaling law for statistical percolation is limited to a concentration range very close to the percolation threshold and the use of this law to extract geometrical information about the CNT network from experimentally determined values of t is controversial, as stated by several authors [10,18,20]. In our case, the relatively high values of t obtained are due to the 'moderate' (2-4 orders of magnitude) changes in electrical conductivity in the vicinity of percolation, which might be related to geometrical constrains imposed by the limited thickness of the film and/or to the specific polymer employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To built up structure property relations, the resultant CNT dispersion and network formation, can be analyzed on nanoscale using charge contrast imaging in scanning electron microscopy, as an alternative to transmission electron microscopy [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the electric resistance of CNT networks at compression has only been measured in [5,6] and the electric properties of CNT particulate reinforcement of polymers, for instance, in [7,8], The obtained data were analyzed to get an estimate of the resistance of CNT tangles and the contact resistance between nanotubes [5]. The aim to reveal the effect of surfacedoping of MWCNT networks on their pressure sensitivity is pursued in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%