2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1098-2140(01)00170-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and organizational learning: past, present, and future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of evaluation process becomes the basis for the next steps to be taken (Yeo, 2003). Therefore, the systematic use of assessment mechanisms is a necessary condition for organizational learning in school and its improvement (for example, see Silins & Mulford, 2004;Torres & Preskill, 2001).…”
Section: Conceptual Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of evaluation process becomes the basis for the next steps to be taken (Yeo, 2003). Therefore, the systematic use of assessment mechanisms is a necessary condition for organizational learning in school and its improvement (for example, see Silins & Mulford, 2004;Torres & Preskill, 2001).…”
Section: Conceptual Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creemers (1994) claims that control is one of the major principles operating in generating educational effectiveness. This implies that goal attainment and the school climate should be evaluated (Grosin, 1993;Torres & Preskill, 2001). It was therefore considered important to treat evaluation of policy for teaching and of other actions taken to improve teaching practice as well as evaluation of the SLE as overarching factors operating at school level.…”
Section: School Policy For Creating a Sle And Actions Taken For Impromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This systematic application of evaluation logic is needed to establish the value, importance, and implication for the focus of the evaluation (e.g., program, school improvement project, standard operating procedure). These types of interventions not only include the collection and monitoring of information, but also the formation of knowledge for decision making and improvement (Owen & Lambert, 1995;Preskill & Torres, 1999;Torres & Preskill, 2001). Examples of the many forms of evaluative inquiry include needs assessment, environmental scanning, program evaluation, and outcome monitoring.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%