2011
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2011.2109005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Optimization of the Specific Absorption Rate for Multiantenna Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas, beamforming has also been considered for minimizing EM emission in mobile communication systems. Although the beamforming technique has been traditionally used to improve the SE of mobile systems, it has been shown in [9], [10] that it can be used to minimize EM emission in the uplink of mobile systems. However, [7]- [9] mainly focus on reducing EM radiation without considering the SE performance/quality of service (QoS) of the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, beamforming has also been considered for minimizing EM emission in mobile communication systems. Although the beamforming technique has been traditionally used to improve the SE of mobile systems, it has been shown in [9], [10] that it can be used to minimize EM emission in the uplink of mobile systems. However, [7]- [9] mainly focus on reducing EM radiation without considering the SE performance/quality of service (QoS) of the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such points, the volumes are also strongly deformed by the phantom shape, so that the refinement strategies give unappreciable benefit. Anyhow, it is important to recall again that, among the possible, only algorithms which can evaluate the SAR everywhere in the phantom have been tested; the others algorithms, such as the one proposed in [15,16] or the one proposed in [17], would have been unable to determine the SAR in such points. As for the C95.3 algorithm, also in this case it is apparent that it underestimates the peak value, and this enforces a more detailed discussion, as it is the only algorithm officially suggested in a radioprotection standard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, the number of available algorithms for the numerical evaluation of SAR is quite large [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and in this section, a brief overview on the most commonly adopted ones is presented and commented. One of the usually adopted approaches [11,12], for instance, computes the SAR rm on a certain point by considering the contributes coming from the cells which belong to a cube centered in that point.…”
Section: Commonly Adopted Sar Numerical Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, antenna design plays an important role even for stand-alone SAR. So far, studies on SAR performance for multi-antennas are quite limited [8][9][10]. A technique to optimize SAR in multi-antenna systems was proposed in [9] using beamforming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, studies on SAR performance for multi-antennas are quite limited [8][9][10]. A technique to optimize SAR in multi-antenna systems was proposed in [9] using beamforming. In [10], SAR levels for ground free, on ground and co-located multiantennas were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%