2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0784-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and modeling of productivity and dynamic capability in high-speed machining centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Draganescu et al (2003) carried out experiments for statistic modelling of machine tool efficiency and of specific consumed energy in machining, and established the relationship between machine tool efficiency and consumed energy which are determined by cutting parameters [18]. Flores et al (2007) considered that the current standards for machine tool performance evaluation did not suit productivity and dynamic capacity at high feed rates, and presented a model for evaluating productivity and dynamic capacity in high-speed machining centres [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Draganescu et al (2003) carried out experiments for statistic modelling of machine tool efficiency and of specific consumed energy in machining, and established the relationship between machine tool efficiency and consumed energy which are determined by cutting parameters [18]. Flores et al (2007) considered that the current standards for machine tool performance evaluation did not suit productivity and dynamic capacity at high feed rates, and presented a model for evaluating productivity and dynamic capacity in high-speed machining centres [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCt 100 × 0.1 ≈ 6.4 (22) Consequently, the user's net profit in one minute can be easily calculated 9−6.4 146 × 60 ≈ 1. Based on equation (19), the potential machining areas of the three segments in unit time are respectively: A p2 = 467.56; A p3 = 581.48; A p4 = 755.77, where A pi is the potential machining area in the ith segment. And using equation (18), MCp of the TP-iPSS with the cutting tool is 84.4.…”
Section: Money =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarizing beam splitter reflects it to the four quadrant photoelectric sensors through the lens, and then the position can be obtained. Flores et al [19] developed a measurement system composed of a 2D angle grid and two 2D slope sensors, named the dual-mode surface encoder. Park et al [20] developed a TCP measurement system using visual images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Time savings are even being considered in high-speed machining. 3 These methods are based on the partitioning of the surface into patches and determining an adequate tool orientation and tool path strategy for each patch. The parameters used for partitioning include the surface coordinates and normal vectors, which provide only local information at the sample points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%