2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and mechanism analysis of HIV prevention programme using resilience framework among female sex workers: A randomised controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundEvidence shows traditional sexual harm reduction for female sex workers (FSW) based on health behaviour theories is effective but short-lived. This study aimed to evaluate and understand the effectiveness of a resilience-promoting programme in improving psychological health and, ultimately, safe sex practice.MethodsA randomised controlled trial was conducted at three Hong Kong-based non-governmental organisations. 127 sex workers were recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention or control gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-efficacy may help overcome internal stigma associated with sex work and HIV. Our findings are consistent with prior work in which self-efficacy, social influences, attitudes and past behaviour were predictors of intention to test [47,48]. Notably, self-efficacy and social influences were significantly positively associated with intention to test for HIV but not syphilis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Self-efficacy may help overcome internal stigma associated with sex work and HIV. Our findings are consistent with prior work in which self-efficacy, social influences, attitudes and past behaviour were predictors of intention to test [47,48]. Notably, self-efficacy and social influences were significantly positively associated with intention to test for HIV but not syphilis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our nding that regular testing was motivated by fears and concerns over maintaining health, ability to work, family responsibilities, and future aspirations or social in uences, and was facilitated by testing habits and self-e cacy is consistent with prior work in which perceived bene ts of testing or attitudes, self-e cacy, social in uences and past behavior have been reported to in uence STI testing [16,[48][49][50]. STI risk perception was high, but disease severity was perceived differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…A complete list of the full text papers reviewed and rationale for exclusion is provided in Supplementary Material S1 . Of the 38 trials included, 33 were randomized controlled trials (RCT), and the other five were nonrandomized controlled studies (NRCS) [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only nine studies addressed enhancing or developing resilience as a second or third objective and/or hypothesis and used a valid resilience measure as a secondary outcome measure [ 26 , 34 , 35 , 46 , 49 , 51 , 54 , 56 , 63 ], concluding that the vast majority of studies had resilience as their main focus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%