2000
DOI: 10.1177/089686080002004s02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Management of Ultrafiltration Problems in Peritoneal Dialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sub-analysis was performed in which patients with UF failure [ 17 ] were withdrawn from the analysis: 13 patients in the short-term, 4 in the medium-term and 9 in the long-term group had UF failure. Similar relationships prevailed (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sub-analysis was performed in which patients with UF failure [ 17 ] were withdrawn from the analysis: 13 patients in the short-term, 4 in the medium-term and 9 in the long-term group had UF failure. Similar relationships prevailed (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the relationship between ultrafiltration (UF) volume and outcome, the European Automated Peritoneal dialysis Outcome Study (EAPOS) reported that the prognosis was poor when the daily UF volume was ≤750 mL in anuric patients (43); whilst in patients with residual renal function, the body fluid volume is affected by the net balance between water and salt intake and removal, and it is difficult to set a fixed UF volume. Achieving a particular level of UF volume is, however, not the primary target, but maintaining a clinical state without edema, hypertension and cardiac overload is most important (44).…”
Section: Chapter 2: Adequacy Of Peritoneal Dialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of the dialysate/plasma (D/P) ratio of Na + after 60 min of a dialysis exchange has been proposed as a semiquantitative method for AQP-1 function (Mujais et al, 2000). Calculation of FWT 0-60 min in patients is also possible using sodium transport in that period: the drained volume is divided in the volume that accompanies Na + transport from the circulation to the dialysate which is assumed to have occurred through the small pores, the remaining part of the drained volume is considered to represent FWT (Smit et al, 2004; La Milia et al, 2005).…”
Section: Pathways For Peritoneal Fluid Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extremely large interindividual variability contrasts with an intraindividual variability of about 20% (Imholz et al, 1978) and points to large differences in transport characteristics of the “peritoneal membrane” between individual patients. The International Society for PD published a guideline on UF failure in 2000, containing a definition of UF failure, based on the results of the above mentioned studies: the 3 × 4 rule (Mujais et al, 2000). It states that UF failure is present when netUF is less than 400 mL after drainage of a 4% (3.86 or 4.25%, depending on the pharmacopeia) dialysis solution with an intraperitoneal stay of 4 h. Although patients with UF failure according to this definition are often hypervolemic, overhydration is not included in the definition of UF failure, because overhydration is not only dependent on fluid removal, but also on fluid intake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%