2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11243043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Intercomparison of SMOS, Aquarius, and SMAP Sea Surface Salinity Products in the Arctic Ocean

Abstract: Salinity is a critical parameter in the Arctic Ocean, having potential implications for climate and weather. This study presents the first systematic analysis of 6 commonly used sea surface salinity (SSS) products from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Aquarius and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellites and the European Space Agency (ESA) Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission, in terms of their consistency among one another and with in-situ data. Overall, the satellite … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding mean difference and RMSD between the ITP and ECCO-v4 time series are −0.03, 0.08, −0.03, and 0.02 pss, and 0.32, 0.39, 0.11, and 0.23 pss, respectively (Figure 3). These values are much smaller than the overall dynamic range of the temporal variability of salinity in the Arctic Ocean reported in the literature (e.g., Fournier et al, 2019) as well as illustrated in Figure 3.…”
Section: Assessment Of the State Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The corresponding mean difference and RMSD between the ITP and ECCO-v4 time series are −0.03, 0.08, −0.03, and 0.02 pss, and 0.32, 0.39, 0.11, and 0.23 pss, respectively (Figure 3). These values are much smaller than the overall dynamic range of the temporal variability of salinity in the Arctic Ocean reported in the literature (e.g., Fournier et al, 2019) as well as illustrated in Figure 3.…”
Section: Assessment Of the State Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This uncertainty multiplied by the regression coefficient corresponds to a threshold of equivalent SSS change that the satellite SSHA-OBPA can help to determine, that is, too small a regression coefficient would correspond to too small an implied change of SSS for a given steric sea level signal. If the implied SSS change is smaller than the discrepancies among satellite SSS and the differences between satellite SSS with the limited in situ data in the Arctic Ocean as reported by Fournier et al (2019), then satellite SSHA-OBPA data will not be helpful in evaluating the quality of satellite SSS. In this respect, a large regression coefficient is helpful because it corresponds to a large dynamic range of implied SSS change.…”
Section: 1029/2020jc016110mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations