2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11934-010-0092-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Follow-Up of Patients with Urinary Lithiasis: Minimizing Radiation Exposure

Abstract: As unenhanced computed tomography (CT) has supplanted other modalities (eg, intravenous urography, ultrasonography) as the "test of choice" for evaluation of stone disease, patients have been exposed to higher doses of ionizing radiation in both primary evaluation and follow-up. There has been progressive recognition that low doses of radiation in the range of conventional CT may increase the long-term risk of cancer in exposed patients; these data have been extrapolated from longitudinal and ongoing study of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have focused on diagnostic procedures such as voiding cystourethrography 10, 11 for congenital abnormalities or CT scanning for identification of urolithiasis. 12, 13 Others have looked at ways to reduce radiation exposure during endourological procedures with specific protocols and technical modifications. 14 An example of such a protocol was designed to standardize how many images and which types were to be typically performed during urodynamic studies, yielding 71% reduction in fluoroscopy times (40.9 to 11.7 seconds per procedure), 73% reductions in mean air kerma (15.48 to 4.25 mGy), and 71% reduction in mean dose area product (518.90 to 150.28 mGym 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have focused on diagnostic procedures such as voiding cystourethrography 10, 11 for congenital abnormalities or CT scanning for identification of urolithiasis. 12, 13 Others have looked at ways to reduce radiation exposure during endourological procedures with specific protocols and technical modifications. 14 An example of such a protocol was designed to standardize how many images and which types were to be typically performed during urodynamic studies, yielding 71% reduction in fluoroscopy times (40.9 to 11.7 seconds per procedure), 73% reductions in mean air kerma (15.48 to 4.25 mGy), and 71% reduction in mean dose area product (518.90 to 150.28 mGym 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low dose and ultra-low dose CT of the urinary tract have high diagnostic accuracy and less radiation dose [15], but they have not been used popularly. The overuse of CT has become a public health concern [12,16]. Sternberg and Littenberg [17] retrospectively analyzed imaging examinations in 7,659 patients with calculi within 90 days of their first visit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] Although rare, the contrast medium itself may cause serious acute (anaphylactic reaction) or late-onset (nephropathy) side effects. [21,22] Conspicuous uncomplicated or asymptomatic urinary pathologies, such as mild dilation or mild stasis due to conditions such as a peripelvic cyst, persistent caliectasis, or prominent extrarenal pelvis, should be able to be evaluated using methods other than those involving contrast enhancement or radiation exposure, especially in young patients who are the most sensitive to the hazards of radiation or anaphylaxis. In addition, cross-sectional, contrast-enhanced procedures can be time-consuming and more expensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, US is a non-invasive, real-time, inexpensive method that does not require iodinated contrast administration or radiation exposure. [21,22] Moreover, for defining obstructive pathologies, gray-scale US can also be a guide for localizing the lower ureteral orifices and examining the ureteric jet flows into the bladder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%