2011
DOI: 10.2480/agrmet.67.1.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and estimation of canopy heat storage fluxes in an apple orchard

Abstract: To precisely evaluate the impact of canopy heat storage on the energy balance of an apple orchard, heat storage flux and its diurnal changes were examined by observation during both growing and sprouting periods. The majority of canopy heat storage was trunk heat storage, followed by sensible and latent heat storages, while the leaf heat storage was negligible. The canopy heat storage flux peaked between 0700 and 0930 and bottomed out at around 1800. The range of diurnal flux was larger in the sprouting period… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Rn D , G D , and St D are cumulative daytime Rn, G, and canopy heat storage (St), respectively. St was estimated from the change in air temperature at the top of the main tower according to Ito et al (2011).…”
Section: Energy Balance Closurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Rn D , G D , and St D are cumulative daytime Rn, G, and canopy heat storage (St), respectively. St was estimated from the change in air temperature at the top of the main tower according to Ito et al (2011).…”
Section: Energy Balance Closurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the EC method has a serious problem of energy imbalance, generally resulting in a serious underestimation of the nocturnal CO 2 efflux. We attempted to resolve this energy imbalance problem for our site (Ito et al, 2011;Ito and Ishida, 2012), but the nocturnal CO 2 efflux still remained uncertain. To overcome this problem, complemental observations of soil respiration were conducted for several EC observation sites (Flanagan and Johnson, 2005;Ohkubo et al, 2007), since the CO 2 emitted from the soil surface is the largest source of nocturnal CO 2 efflux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%