2009 Second International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iccee.2009.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Discussion of Multi-modal Emotion Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The person independent one uses a general emotional profile for all possible interaction partners. While The person-specific method outperforms the person independent method, the latter exhibits more validity than the former [2], [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The person independent one uses a general emotional profile for all possible interaction partners. While The person-specific method outperforms the person independent method, the latter exhibits more validity than the former [2], [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, many existing methods use exaggerated expression of prototypical emotions and have not used a natural environment [7,8]. On the other hand, facial expressions do not necessarily reflect specific emotions, as facial expressions are usually ambiguous and very dependent on the person's character.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use active appearance models (AAMs) [12] for the extraction of facial features, which were also utilized by many others [13], [14], [15]. For comparison, we also performed some experiments with constrained local models (CLMs) [16], [17], which are also widely used for face recognition.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%