2001
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.17.1273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Comparison of Two Selective Extraction Procedures for Heavy Metal Speciation in Sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 An example of the operationally defined nature of the fractions, is that, in some soils, high concentrations were extracted into the second fraction even in the presence of low carbonate contents, as in the case of the contaminated soil in Pieve Vergonte described above. It is possible that the extracted metals were initially weakly sorbed to some sites of the surface of clays and Fe/Mn oxohydroxides or weakly associated with organic matter.…”
Section: Characterization Of Soil Properties Behaviour and Plant Avamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 An example of the operationally defined nature of the fractions, is that, in some soils, high concentrations were extracted into the second fraction even in the presence of low carbonate contents, as in the case of the contaminated soil in Pieve Vergonte described above. It is possible that the extracted metals were initially weakly sorbed to some sites of the surface of clays and Fe/Mn oxohydroxides or weakly associated with organic matter.…”
Section: Characterization Of Soil Properties Behaviour and Plant Avamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has proved reproducible and has given good recoveries. 2,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The present study reports results from the application of a BCR sequential extraction procedure to the study of the chemical associations, indirectly the mobility and bioavailability, of six metals, chromium, copper, manganese, nickel, lead, and zinc, in (i) sediments sampled from two polluted rivers, the Fès and Sebou, (ii) soils irrigated by polluted water from these two rivers. The contents of Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn in the extracts were measured by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the ability to determine the chemical form or kind of association with different mineralogical phases in soils and sediments has become increasingly important. 2 To date, it has generally been accepted that the most appropriate methods to evaluate the chemical partitioning patterns are selective sequential extraction procedures, which are widely used to assess long term emission potential of pollutants and to predict the metal distribution among different fractions, usually including exchangeable ones, associated to the carbonates, associated to Fe-Mn oxides (or reducible), associated to organic matter and sulphides (or oxidisable) and residual fractions TABLE 1. A large number of sequential extraction procedures have been developed for the determination of heavy metals in contaminated soils and sediments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15] One of the tools used to evaluate the behavior of trace metals in river sediments is the sequential extraction method. 16 Fractionation by sequential extraction provides valuable information regarding the relationship between metals and sediments. In this procedure, the sample is treated with a succession of extraction reagents with the specific intention of dissolving the different phases (or fractions) of sediment and thereby allowing the determination of the associated metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%