The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and comparison of thermal performance of latent heat storage units with shell-and-tube, rectangular, and cylindrical configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach offers several advantageous features, including minimal temperature variation during the storage process and high storage capacity. Over the past three decades, numerous studies have focused on exploring the benefits of LTES, [1][2][3][4][5] comparing various LTES configurations, 6,7 developing novel classes of PCMs, 8,9 and implementing LTES in solar domestic hot water (SDHW) systems. [10][11][12][13] Due to the low thermal conductivity of most PCMs, the heat transfer rate within LTES systems is limited, resulting in a reduced phase change rate during charging and discharging periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach offers several advantageous features, including minimal temperature variation during the storage process and high storage capacity. Over the past three decades, numerous studies have focused on exploring the benefits of LTES, [1][2][3][4][5] comparing various LTES configurations, 6,7 developing novel classes of PCMs, 8,9 and implementing LTES in solar domestic hot water (SDHW) systems. [10][11][12][13] Due to the low thermal conductivity of most PCMs, the heat transfer rate within LTES systems is limited, resulting in a reduced phase change rate during charging and discharging periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCM can mainly be enclosed in cylindrical [20], rectangular [21], spherical [22,23], trapezate [24], shell-and-tube [25,26], triplex-tube [19,27,28], and parallelepiped [29,30] containers [31,32]. In recent years, researchers have focused on comparing various geometric solutions and their impact on the heat transfer rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is further enhanced as the amount of PCM in the containers increases. Ding et al [26] developed interesting geometric variants for rectangular, cylindrical, and shell-and-tube containers. The results of the research showed that, despite the fact that natural convection intensity is the highest in cylindrical storage, the shell-and-tube LHTES achieves the highest heat transfer rate due to the lowest thermal resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%