2007
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10063-0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Comparison of the Surface Roughness and Porosity of Different Provisional Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study

Abstract: Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the surface roughness and porosity of different provisional restorative materials. Materials and methods Provisional restorative materials were divided into following three groups: Dental products of india (DPI), Protemp, Tempofit. For each group, wax block with 20 × 10 × 3 mm was made for making vinyl polysiloxane impression material to give 12 samples in each group of three different provisional restorative materials. The acrylic resin was inserted i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Micro-CT can provide a powerful, nondestructive 3D approach for quantifying the porosity of materials [55]. Porosity is multifactorial and may be in uenced by monomer shrinkage during polymerization [56], air trapping during material mixing [57], or monomer vaporization associated with exothermic reactions [58]. The porosity analysis showed better results for the CAD/CAM PMMA resin, with a lower percentage of porosity and, consequently, a lower mean surface roughness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro-CT can provide a powerful, nondestructive 3D approach for quantifying the porosity of materials [55]. Porosity is multifactorial and may be in uenced by monomer shrinkage during polymerization [56], air trapping during material mixing [57], or monomer vaporization associated with exothermic reactions [58]. The porosity analysis showed better results for the CAD/CAM PMMA resin, with a lower percentage of porosity and, consequently, a lower mean surface roughness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%