2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0094-5765(03)80016-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and comparison of space solar power concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to appreciate the simplicity of the concept described here, one needs to compare it with the earlier Integrated Symmetric Concentrator Space Power Satellite (ICS SPS) shown in figure 11 and described by Feingold and Carrington [4]. That concept has 2 x 42 large mirror arrays focusing sunlight onto a center satellite body where there are solar cell arrays that receive the sunlight and convert it into electricity and then into a microwave beam that then the SPS sends energy to a special earth ground station to be converted into electricity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to appreciate the simplicity of the concept described here, one needs to compare it with the earlier Integrated Symmetric Concentrator Space Power Satellite (ICS SPS) shown in figure 11 and described by Feingold and Carrington [4]. That concept has 2 x 42 large mirror arrays focusing sunlight onto a center satellite body where there are solar cell arrays that receive the sunlight and convert it into electricity and then into a microwave beam that then the SPS sends energy to a special earth ground station to be converted into electricity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are 3 different LEO launch cost references. There is the near term Falcon Heavy [7] or an estimate used in the NASA SPS study [4] assuming more frequent launches or a revolutionary system proposed in an Air Force Research Lab study [8]. Given that launch costs should be less with reusable launch vehicles and frequent standard launch procedures, the NASA estimate of $400 per kg will be used here.…”
Section: Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ehricke assumed that the 1200 sq km solar field would produce electricity at 15% efficiency implying a 180 GW central power station which then implies enormous distribution problems. While this Power Soletta concept was intriguing, given the problems just described, NASA has focused much more attention over the subsequent years on the Space Power Satellite (SPS) concept [3,4]. A recent version (2003) of this SPS concept is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. It is 5 x 15 km in size , and requires a ground station 8 km in diameter [2]. The size, mass, and power levels of this orbital system makes the proposed SPS extremely expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%