2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9121269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Comparison of Long-Term MODIS C5.1 and C6 Products against AERONET Observations over China

Abstract: MODIS (MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) aerosol products are the most widely used satellite retrieved aerosol optic depth (AOD) products, which compensate for the spatial lack of ground-based sun photometer observations. The newly released Collection 6 (C6) aerosol products have some improvements compared to the Collection 5.1 (C5.1) products with optimized algorithms and newly revised upstream products. Additionally, a three-kilometer resolution AOD product was added in the C6 product. In this s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the spatial distribution of correlation coefficients (R), we found that highly correlated areas ( R > 0.8) are largely located in high AOD regions, implying that MERRA‐2 AOD may well capture the spatial pattern of the aerosol pollution, especially over regions with heavy aerosol pollution over China (Figure c). In addition, many studies related to MODIS AOD estimation suggest that AOD over China is substantially overestimated by MODIS (Fan et al, ; Tao et al, , ; Wang et al, ; Xie et al, ), especially over urban areas of eastern China (Xie et al, ). For example, one result from Tao et al (Tao et al, ) indicates that under high AOD (>0.4) conditions the overestimation of the AOD in DT retrieval is prevalent throughout the whole year, whereas the DB retrieval has a positive bias in winter (in the range of 0.13–0.24) and slight overestimation in fall.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the spatial distribution of correlation coefficients (R), we found that highly correlated areas ( R > 0.8) are largely located in high AOD regions, implying that MERRA‐2 AOD may well capture the spatial pattern of the aerosol pollution, especially over regions with heavy aerosol pollution over China (Figure c). In addition, many studies related to MODIS AOD estimation suggest that AOD over China is substantially overestimated by MODIS (Fan et al, ; Tao et al, , ; Wang et al, ; Xie et al, ), especially over urban areas of eastern China (Xie et al, ). For example, one result from Tao et al (Tao et al, ) indicates that under high AOD (>0.4) conditions the overestimation of the AOD in DT retrieval is prevalent throughout the whole year, whereas the DB retrieval has a positive bias in winter (in the range of 0.13–0.24) and slight overestimation in fall.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This deviation may be related to the use of different versions of MODIS data: in the MERRA-2 AOD observing system, MERRA-2 assimilated the biascorrected AOD derived from MODIS radiances, Collection 5 (C5; Buchard et al, 2017), and the MODIS data used in this study was the latest collection (Collection 6.1, C6). Different versions mean differences in algorithms (Fan et al, 2017), which may affect the statistical error.…”
Section: Global Aod Trend Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as a consequence of clean-air actions, anthropogenic emissions in China have declined significantly in recent years (Zheng et al, 2018). It has been proven that these changes in local pollutant emissions or aerosol precursors over the above regions can, to a certain extent, explain the regional AOD variability, as observed in long-term satellite aerosol data records (De Meij et al, 2012;Itahashi et al, 2012;Feng et al, 2018). On the other hand, various studies have shown that meteorological changes play a major role in determining the inter-decadal trend of AOD over mineraldust-dominant regions, particularly in the Sahara desert (SD) and the ME (Pozzer et al, 2015;Klingmüller et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerosol data used as input to the algorithm, are part of MODIS Aqua spatiotemporally aggregated Level-3 daily gridded atmospheric data product (MYD08_D3). More specifically, Collection 006 (C006) MODIS Aqua aerosol data are used, which are generated by reprocessing MODIS data archives using calibration enhancements, algorithm refinements, and upstream product improvements [55,56] and have replaced the previous MODIS C005 data providing a better performance against AERONET data [57][58][59]. The following MODIS aerosol data describing the load and size of aerosols are used (as explained in Section 2.2) in the algorithm: (i) Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), (ii) Ångström Exponent (a), and (iii) Fine Mode Fraction (FF) of AOD (the aerosol fine-mode fraction is defined as [60]: FF=AOD f /(AOD f + AOD c ), where AOD f is the aerosol fine-mode optical depth and AOD c is the aerosol coarse-mode optical depth).…”
Section: Modis and Omi Satellite Datamentioning
confidence: 99%