Evaluation and Comparison of Human Chorionic Amniotic Membrane and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Achieving Bone Formation and Soft Tissue Healing in Extraction Sockets Indicated for Rehabilitation with Implants: A Preliminary Study

Chopra, Ratima; Bhate, Kalyani; Gadkari, Nishtha; Kakodkar, Pradnya; Kulkarni, Deepak P.

doi:10.11607/jomi.8344

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Only studies that were published within 3 years of the search date were included ( n = 60). After duplicate removal and screening, 50 articles were included in the analysis 35‐84 (Figure 2).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another study compared natural healing with L‐PRF or L‐PRF plus Plaster of Paris and concluded that the latter was the best option for bony infill, although this was only measured on two‐dimensional imaging 67 . A recent, small split‐mouth study found L‐PRF performed equally to human chorionic amniotic membrane for socket preservation on histological assessment, although there was no control group 36 . Clark et al reported that A‐PRF with or without human allograft improved vital bone formation compared to allograft alone, although all three trial arms outperformed control 63 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…67 A recent, small split-mouth study found L-PRF performed equally to human chorionic amniotic membrane for socket preservation on histological assessment, although there was no control group. 36 Clark et al reported that A-PRF with or without human allograft improved vital bone formation compared to allograft alone, although all three trial arms outperformed control. 63 Consistent with many of the third molar studies mentioned below, one included study found that L-PRF reduced pain and self-reported analgesic use compared to control.…”

Section: Oral Surgery (Extractions Socket Preservation and Implant Pl...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

What recent evidence exists to support the use of platelet‐rich fibrin in clinical dentistry? A systematic literature review

Savva

2022

Oral Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Platelet‐rich fibrin (PRF) is a second‐generation platelet concentrate and biomaterial with multiple applications in clinical dentistry. Recent developments in the production of PRF have resulted in several divergent protocols that could be seen to affect the reproducibility and generalisability of the available literature. Additionally, imprecise reporting on PRF production is a further confounding factor with respect to previous trial data. Aims The primary aim of this review was to assess the recent clinical trial data relating to the use of PRF, irrespective of centrifugal protocol, in clinical dentistry. Methods A systematic literature review was carried out in PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases to select English language, human clinical trials involving the use of PRF published between July 2018 and July 2021. Results The 50 included studies demonstrated an overall clinical benefit for the use of PRF in the fields of oral medicine, oral surgery and periodontology, with unclear benefits in the field of endodontology, and no clear benefit in the field of orthodontics. Only 16% of the included studies met published standards for reporting PRF production protocols, and meeting such standards should be an essential requirement for future publications. Conclusions There was little direct evidence to support one particular PRF protocol over another and this remains an area of controversy. Future research should focus on precise reporting of PRF protocols, and in areas where PRF is of known benefit, the use of different production methods should be compared to assess what, if any, clinical significance is attached to particular centrifugation protocols and tubes.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Oral Surgery (Extractions Socket Preservation and Implant Pl...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What recent evidence exists to support the use of platelet‐rich fibrin in clinical dentistry? A systematic literature review

Savva

2022

Oral Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[ 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ] In our literature search, we have noticed that only a few comparative studies have reported the use of AM with local flaps or autografts in intraoral surgical defects. [ 35 35 36 37 38 ] Mostafa et al . reported the use AM and buccal fat pad in intraoral surgical defects after excision of leukoplakia.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lyophilised Amniotic Membrane in Intraoral Surgical Defects: A Prospective Clinical Study

Hazarika¹,

Malik

Adhyapok

et al. 2022

Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The incidence of infection and scarring in intraoral raw wounds are decreased when wounds are grafted with biological materials. The favourable results of many studies about amniotic membrane in wound healing inspired us to investigate the effects of lyophilised amniotic membrane in intaoral surgical defects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the healing of oral mucosal defects after application of lyophilised amniotic membrane (AM). Methods: Fifteen patients with oral precancerous lesions were included in this study. Lyophilised amniotic membrane was applied to the intraoral surgical defect, after wide excision of the lesion. The effectiveness of the lyophilised AM was evaluated by scoring the following parameters operability, haemostatic status, pain, feeding situation, epithelialisation, change in mouth opening, mucosal suppleness and safety. Results: The lyophilised amniotic membrane has been found to be effective in this study after evaluation of the parameters. No infection or allergic reaction was noticed after application of the lyophilised amniotic membrane in intraoral surgical defects. Discussion: In our study, the size and site of the surgical defect influenced the scar contracture so we suggest lyophilised AM may not prevent scarring for extensive surgical defects. All other findings regarding the effectiveness of lyophilised amniotic membrane in oral wound healing are in accordance with the findings of other studies conducted on hyperdry and cryopreserved AM. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, the results showed that the lyophilised amniotic membrane is a cost effective material for immediate coverage of the intraoral surgical defects.

show abstract

Mechanical properties of platelet-rich fibrin from patients on warfarin

Marinho

Viana

Silva

et al. 2023

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation and Comparison of Human Chorionic Amniotic Membrane and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Achieving Bone Formation and Soft Tissue Healing in Extraction Sockets Indicated for Rehabilitation with Implants: A Preliminary Study

Cited by 3 publications

References 6 publications

What recent evidence exists to support the use of platelet‐rich fibrin in clinical dentistry? A systematic literature review

What recent evidence exists to support the use of platelet‐rich fibrin in clinical dentistry? A systematic literature review

Lyophilised Amniotic Membrane in Intraoral Surgical Defects: A Prospective Clinical Study

Mechanical properties of platelet-rich fibrin from patients on warfarin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About