2013 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icems.2013.6713137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and comparison of different numerical computation methods for the electromagnetic torque in electrical machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In FEM numerical calculations of magnetic circuits, the Coulomb and the Maxwell stress tensor methods are the most frequently used approaches to determine the electromagnetic torque value [6,12,15,19,20]. A high accuracy of results can also be obtained using the method proposed by Arkkio, based on the Maxwell stress tensor method [11,21,22].…”
Section: Numerical Model Of the Line-start Reluctance Motormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FEM numerical calculations of magnetic circuits, the Coulomb and the Maxwell stress tensor methods are the most frequently used approaches to determine the electromagnetic torque value [6,12,15,19,20]. A high accuracy of results can also be obtained using the method proposed by Arkkio, based on the Maxwell stress tensor method [11,21,22].…”
Section: Numerical Model Of the Line-start Reluctance Motormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, because the elements in the air-gap are geometrically distorted or re-meshed to accommodate arbitrary movement, the results often have an oscillating error component. 5 It has been shown that this problem can be drastically reduced by using higher order elements in the moving band. 13 However, the use of higher order elements increases the density of the element, and the computational time will substantial increase as the case of the air-gap element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The movement is accomplished by a simple recalculation of the Fourier series without any modification of the mesh structure, resulting in simple and efficient time-stepping. [5][6][7] The results can be very accurate because of the high order of the field representation in the air-gap region. 8 But for the insertion of dense matrix blocks into the sparse finite element matrices, the computational time is substantially increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%