2017
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2017.2672786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Comparison of Daily Rainfall From Latest GPM and TRMM Products Over the Mekong River Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5, with a median of CCs equal to 0.6 (for early and late runs) and 0.7 (for final), we concluded that there is generally a moderate correlation [0.5 , CC , 0.7 was considered as a moderate correlation based on Tan and Santo (2018)] between IPPs and gauge observations. The same results have been reported for other regions, for example, Blue Nile basin (Sahlu et al 2016), Mekong River basin (Wang et al 2017), Malaysia (Tan and Santo 2018), and northern Pakistan (Anjum et al 2018). Therefore, following the Brown (2006) and Condom et al (2011) who suggested a correlation higher than 0.7 and RBias between 610% for a reliable precipitation dataset, none of the IPPs (without preprocessing) can be considered as an alternative for gauge observations over Iran (see Table 7).…”
Section: (Iv) Gpcc Full Data Reanalysis and Gpcc Monitoringsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…5, with a median of CCs equal to 0.6 (for early and late runs) and 0.7 (for final), we concluded that there is generally a moderate correlation [0.5 , CC , 0.7 was considered as a moderate correlation based on Tan and Santo (2018)] between IPPs and gauge observations. The same results have been reported for other regions, for example, Blue Nile basin (Sahlu et al 2016), Mekong River basin (Wang et al 2017), Malaysia (Tan and Santo 2018), and northern Pakistan (Anjum et al 2018). Therefore, following the Brown (2006) and Condom et al (2011) who suggested a correlation higher than 0.7 and RBias between 610% for a reliable precipitation dataset, none of the IPPs (without preprocessing) can be considered as an alternative for gauge observations over Iran (see Table 7).…”
Section: (Iv) Gpcc Full Data Reanalysis and Gpcc Monitoringsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The r was used to quantify the type of correlation and dependence between satellite products and gauge observations in fundamental statistics. The RB and RRMSE were used to describe the bias and error of satellite precipitation compared with gauge observations [33][34][35]. The equations of the indicators are as follows:…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMERG combines passive microwave data from the GPM satellite, microwave‐calibrated infrared satellite data, and monthly data from the Global Precipitation Climatology Center to estimate precipitation (Huffman et al, ). This GPM product has been demonstrated to perform better than the TRMM product across the TP and its surrounding regions (Li et al, ; Wang, Lu, et al, ; Xu et al, ) and can describe the spatial variation of precipitation in detail (Ma et al, ) (albeit with some obvious regions with a wet bias over the TP; Chen & Li, ; Tang et al, ). One additional advantage of the IMERG product is its high temporal resolution (30 min), which can be used for resolving the full diurnal variation of precipitation and, therefore, for furthering our understanding of this important aspect of the regional weather processes.…”
Section: Study Area and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%