2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and characterization of manual reaching in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggest that the difficulties in reaching experienced by preschool‐ and school‐age children with CP begin in early infancy. This contradicts our hypothesis that infants with CP ‘grow into their deficit’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results suggest that the difficulties in reaching experienced by preschool‐ and school‐age children with CP begin in early infancy. This contradicts our hypothesis that infants with CP ‘grow into their deficit’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Cerebral palsy (CP) constitutes a group of disorders in which motor impairment is an important feature . In children with CP, motor impairments may induce difficulties on a daily basis, for example during reaching and grasping . Reaching is essential for daily routine and participation in social contexts, as it is used during actions such as eating, drinking, dressing, but also during interaction with the environment, for example during play activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reaching skill is mostly used in daily tasks and functional activities. Using upper extremities in different activities was limited in children with CP (24) . The hemiparetic upper extremity in children with unilateral spastic CP is nearly neglected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the Quality Rating Checklist (QRC), which was developed by Visicato et al (2015) based on previous quality assessment tools (Da Costa, et al, 2013; Soh et al, 2011). The QRC was chosen because it enables the quality assessment of non-randomized studies by rating the study’s rationale, hypothesis, study design, participants, selection criteria, recruitment process, sampling method, ethical aspects, drop out rate, sample size, variables of interest, statistical analysis, results, external validity, conclusion, and study limitations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%