2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00188-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and calibration of an electromagnetic tracking device for biomechanical analysis of lifting tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of these techniques reduced the error rate associated with sensor position and orientation in this study to levels similar to previous work. [29][30][31] Additionally, preliminary data have shown electromagnetic tracking as a reliable tool for use in the examination of pitching kinematics. 43 Second, although competition was simulated throughout this study, there have been differences observed in movement when performed in both a simulated competitive setting and an actual competitive setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Use of these techniques reduced the error rate associated with sensor position and orientation in this study to levels similar to previous work. [29][30][31] Additionally, preliminary data have shown electromagnetic tracking as a reliable tool for use in the examination of pitching kinematics. 43 Second, although competition was simulated throughout this study, there have been differences observed in movement when performed in both a simulated competitive setting and an actual competitive setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Increases in instrumental sensitivity have reduced this error to near 2° following system calibration. 30 Therefore, before testing sessions, the current system was calibrated using previously established techniques. [29][30][31] Following calibration, the error associated with position and orientation of the electromagnetic sensors within the calibrated axes system was less than 0.02 m and 3°, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error compensation can be performed online during the use of the tracking system, based on another independent [31,32] Combination of EM and optical tracking systems Birkfellner et al [17] Using discrete LUT Meskers et al [107] Measurements averaged over time at reference points Perie et al [136] LUT based on plexi phantom Day et al [26] Employing a calibration phantom Interpolation Raab et al [148] First polynomial fit Thormann et al [177] Online correction by Hardy's multiquadric method Himberg et al [57] Multi-sensor data collection with LEGO Ikits et al [62] 4 th order polynomial fit Bryson et al [21] 4 th order polynomial fit Hagedorn et al [50] Delaunay tetrahedralization for rotations Kindratenko et al [71] 3-5 th order polynomial fit Nakamoto et al [124] 0-4 th order polynomial fit Traub et al [181] Interpolation on the top of LUT Fischer [35] Thin-Plate Spline Interpolation, Bernstein-polynoms Kelemen [67] Delaunay tetrahedralization and polynomial fit Extrapolation Kelemen [67] Extrapolation based on global polynomial fit…”
Section: B Active Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereo-photogrammetric systems (SP) are very accurate, but their use is limited by their cost, time, space, and expertise requirements. Magnetic based motion capture systems suffer from interference of undesired magnetic fields in the measurement volume [5], [6]. Wearable inertial sensors are a valuable alternative, however the drift affecting their output signals limits the reliability of the estimation of the derived position and orientation [7]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%