2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating water provision service at the sub-watershed scale by combining supply, demand, and spatial flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carbon storage module calculated the historical carbon storage based only on the conversion of land use patterns, which is not sufficiently comprehensive [20]; due to the availability of data, we did not refer to the permanent monitoring sites data and NDVI in the evaluation, which meant that the results could not better characterize the impact of afforestation on regional carbon sinks. The InVEST model used the water balance method to calculate the annual water yield, and this module fails to consider the surface water and groundwater [62]. The soil conservation module mainly relies on the RUSLE, and this model represents an improvement over the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) model but is mainly appropriate for plain areas and areas with gentle slopes.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon storage module calculated the historical carbon storage based only on the conversion of land use patterns, which is not sufficiently comprehensive [20]; due to the availability of data, we did not refer to the permanent monitoring sites data and NDVI in the evaluation, which meant that the results could not better characterize the impact of afforestation on regional carbon sinks. The InVEST model used the water balance method to calculate the annual water yield, and this module fails to consider the surface water and groundwater [62]. The soil conservation module mainly relies on the RUSLE, and this model represents an improvement over the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) model but is mainly appropriate for plain areas and areas with gentle slopes.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the water security from the VSs' perspective offers the advantage of gaining insights into the specific water requirements of each VS and whether their corresponding water sources can provide an ample supply. Additionally, by combining the supply-demand relationship into the RWA model, a comprehensive representation of the water challenges faced by VSs in mountainous rural areas can be achieved [31][32][33]. Relying solely on regional-scale data and indicators to evaluate the water security characteristics of a given region would fail to diagnose these issues [34,35].…”
Section: Accurate Assessment and Strategic Support Of Rural Water Sec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water supply services (WSSs) are the storage and retention of water by ecosystems, which are vital services in watershed ecosystems [15] and play a crucial role in the water balance of watersheds and human survival and development [16]. Since the 1990s, WSSs have become a hot topic of research in watershed management [17,18]. Previously, the assessment of ESs was mainly based on land use types and combined with factor analysis [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%