Evaluating user preferences for video transfer methods from a mobile device to a TV screen

Fleury, Alexandre; Pedersen, Jakob Schou; Larsen, Lars Bo

doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.05.003

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If different affordances foster a new variety of gratifications, we should anticipate behavioral changes in media selection based on the expectation of these new gratifications. Televisions, laptops, tablets, and smartphones are found to be the four ubiquitous media equipment in the current media environment (Dearman & Pierce, 2008;Fleury, Pedersen, Bo Larsen, 2013). In terms of content, news, sports, movies, and short entertainment are asked about in this study.…”

Section: Affordance-based Gratifications Of Devicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technological Affordance-Based Gratifications and Their Impact on Media Selection

Yang

Bailey

2020

JoCTEC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explored whether technological affordances introduced new gratifications and whether those gratifications influenced media consumption. An online survey was conducted using MTurk to examine whether individuals perceived technological affordance-based gratifications for different devices (TV, laptops, tablets, and smartphones) and whether those gratifications affected individuals’ media consumption behaviors. Results suggested that technological features did cultivate a variety of new gratifications. We also found individuals’ device selection was significantly associated with affordance-based gratifications. Although perceived low in affordance-based gratifications, TVs were still generally preferred over other devices for media content consumption. These findings not only illustrated the power of communication technologies in cultivating individuals’ psychological needs, but also broadened the gratification research by identifying new gratifications and demonstrating that these gratifications could influence individuals’ media consumption. In addition, findings in this study offered insights for designing technological features that can better satisfy individuals’ psychological needs.

show abstract

Section: Affordance-based Gratifications Of Devicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technological Affordance-Based Gratifications and Their Impact on Media Selection

Yang

Bailey

2020

JoCTEC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, Fleury et al [14] investigated user preferences for screen mirroring with a mobile and a TV. Screen mirroring has been further explored with an aim to promote mutual sharing of content between users from their personal mobile devices.…”

Section: Screen Mirroringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Interaction with Dual-Screen Television Through Display Commonalities

Neate

Evans²,

Jones

2017

Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Figure 1: A user utilising display commonalities. In a) we can see the feed from the TV duplicated in the corner of the tablet as the user browses related information on the web; then in b) the same concept is implemented for a companion application; in c) the TV material is mirrored behind a companion application; and, in d), the user is casting her companion application into the corner of the TV. Permanent ABSTRACTSecond screening -engaging with a mobile device while watching TV -is ubiquitous. Previous research demonstrates that this is hampered by cognitive and physical disjuncts between the simultaneous content streams. To engage effectively with more than one screen, users must manage their attention, for example, by frequently adjusting their gaze or posture. This can lead to cognitive effort, which leads to disengagement, content sacrifice, and ultimately, affects user experience (UX) negatively. In this paper, we look to improve the design of the dual-screen scenario through display commonalities; the mirroring of one content stream (e.g., TV material or second screen content) within the other. We evaluate this design space with professional broadcast practitioners, and then conduct an empirical investigation to determine the impact of the most successful methods towards understanding their impact, and designing towards positive UX with multi-device scenarios.

show abstract

“…Fleury et al report an approach to transform video content from a mobile device to a television [8] and point out that more attention is needed to consider differences among devices such as size of screen and keyboard availability. Ubiquitous computing scenarios not only enable ubiquitous access, but also bring a challenge for system and user interface designers.…”

Section: Background To Lifelogging and Pervasive Accessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating Access Mechanisms for Multimodal Representations of Lifelogs

Qiu

Gurrin

Smeaton

2016

MultiMedia Modeling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Lifelogging, the automatic and ambient capture of daily life activities into a digital archive called a lifelog, is an increasingly popular activity with a wide range of applications areas including medical (memory support), behavioural science (analysis of quality of life), workrelated (auto-recording of tasks) and more. In this paper we focus on lifelogging where there is sometimes a need to re-find something from one's past, recent or distant, from the lifelog. To be effective, a lifelog should be accessible across a variety of access devices. In the work reported here we create eight lifelogging interfaces and evaluate their effectiveness on three access devices; laptop, smartphone and e-book reader, for a searching task. Based on tests with 16 users, we identify which of the eight interfaces are most effective for each access device in a knownitem search task through the lifelog, for both the lifelog owner, and for other searchers. Our results are important in suggesting ways in which personal lifelogs can be most effectively used and accessed.

show abstract

Evaluating user preferences for video transfer methods from a mobile device to a TV screen

Cited by 7 publications

References 15 publications

Technological Affordance-Based Gratifications and Their Impact on Media Selection

Technological Affordance-Based Gratifications and Their Impact on Media Selection

Enhancing Interaction with Dual-Screen Television Through Display Commonalities

Evaluating Access Mechanisms for Multimodal Representations of Lifelogs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About