2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating tropical forest classification and field sampling stratification from lidar to reduce effort and enable landscape monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre-stratification based on aerial images did not improve the model accuracies, as the optical imagery was not able to detect the small variations at the plot level, although the ALS-based pre-stratification (into mature and young stands) resulted in a slight improvement. Similarly, ALS-based pre-stratification can also reduce the sampling efforts by up to 41 % ( de Almeida Papa et al 2020).…”
Section: Aboveground Biomass Predictions In Als-based Direct Fst (Iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-stratification based on aerial images did not improve the model accuracies, as the optical imagery was not able to detect the small variations at the plot level, although the ALS-based pre-stratification (into mature and young stands) resulted in a slight improvement. Similarly, ALS-based pre-stratification can also reduce the sampling efforts by up to 41 % ( de Almeida Papa et al 2020).…”
Section: Aboveground Biomass Predictions In Als-based Direct Fst (Iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have shown ALS data to enable forest stratification which led to a reduction of 41% in the required sampling intensity [24]. This significant reduction in sampling units (from 46 to 27-1 ha plots) saved US $28,500.00 by reducing the field work, which paid for the ALS data collection (US $26,400.00) [24]. We believe that following the approach that reduces sampling intensity [24] with the approach proposed in this paper could be a future object of study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than supplanting existing approaches, ALS data can be integrated into current forest management processes [23] by providing information about the vertical structure that can be linked with the horizontal structure from field plots [19,24]. Studies have shown that ALS data can already provide information about the terrain characteristics [25], drainage network [26], forest characteristics [24,27], gaps dynamics [28,29], vegetation structure [30][31][32], coarse woody debris [33], tree life stage [34], diameter distribution [35,36], and others. However, ALS can only provide limited information related to forest composition, i.e., tree species [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Airborne LiDAR has been used to characterize vertical canopy structure, crown shape, and aboveground biomass for entire ecosystems (Lefsky et al 2002;Parker et al 2004;Coops et al 2007;Stark et al 2012;Harding et al 2001;Cao et al 2014;Ellsworth and Reich 1993;Papa, 2020). It has also been used to identify tree species Koch 2011, 2012;Vaughn et al 2012;Axelsson et al 2018;Hovi et al 2016;Fassnacht et al 2016;Fedrigo et al 2018) and to study stand characteristics such as age, crown cover, and basal area (Korhonen et al 2011;Racine et al 2014;White et al 2013;Karna et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%