2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-019-09681-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the websites of academic departments through SEO criteria: a hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDM approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these studies, the authors used different types of MCDM methods to significantly determine the decision problem. The AHP [21,23,50], TOPSIS [22]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In these studies, the authors used different types of MCDM methods to significantly determine the decision problem. The AHP [21,23,50], TOPSIS [22]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, the authors used different types of MCDM methods to significantly determine the decision problem. The AHP [21,23,50], TOPSIS [22][23][24], DEMATEL [25], and ANP [27] methods have been used for assessing the performance of e-commerce websites. In this study, we identified that none of the researchers utilized a Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS-Grey model to assess the B2C e-commerce factors and sub-factors when assessing e-commerce websites in the context of China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations