2019
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Utility of Species Distribution Models in Informing Climate Change-Resilient Grassland Restoration Strategy

Abstract: Tallgrass prairie ecosystems in North America are heavily degraded and require effective restoration strategies if prairie specialist taxa are to be preserved. One common management tool used to restore grassland is the application of a seed-mix of native prairie plant species. While this technique is effective in the short-term, it is critical that species' resilience to changing climate be evaluated when designing these mixes. By utilizing species distribution models (SDMs), species' bioclimatic envelopes-an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, when CTmin evolution was constrained in the PVE model, there remained a ~6-fold increase (RCP 4.5: 1,227,002 km 2 ; RCP 8.5: 1,334,314 km 2 ) in the geographic range compared to current day. These differences in the predicted distributions underline the significance of incorporating empirical evolutionary data into SDMs 5,21,22 , and in particular the need to consider behaviour in addition to physiology when predicting range shifts 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, when CTmin evolution was constrained in the PVE model, there remained a ~6-fold increase (RCP 4.5: 1,227,002 km 2 ; RCP 8.5: 1,334,314 km 2 ) in the geographic range compared to current day. These differences in the predicted distributions underline the significance of incorporating empirical evolutionary data into SDMs 5,21,22 , and in particular the need to consider behaviour in addition to physiology when predicting range shifts 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, when CTmin was allowed to evolve at a rate scaled by the percent of the trait variance that is explained by individual loci (reflective of a scenario where selection acted solely on those loci), there was a substantial increase in the area of the Normal Behaviour envelope. These changes to the projected species distributions under climate change underscore the importance of incorporating behavioural as well as physiological data into SDMs (Sunday, Bates, & Dulvy, 2012), as well as the key role that thermal trait evolution could play in range shifts (Buckley et al, 2010; Evans, Diamond, & Kelly, 2015; Lyon, Debinski, & Rangwala, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant for many rare and at-risk species targeted by SSAs, whose known habitat requirements are mostly limited to descriptive habitat associations. Further, SDM development could also function in a predictive context (future status) by incorporating climate and management scenarios, enhancing the conservation value of SDMs (Wiens et al 2009;Porfirio et al 2014;Lyon et al 2019).…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is often of interest across a broad range of spatial and temporal scales, from high-resolution information that is more relevant for research on habitat selection (Matthiopoulos et al 2011) or needed to inform management objectives (Zipkin et al 2010) to larger-scale inferences that are useful to address broader questions (e.g. potential range-shifts with changing climatic conditions; Lyon et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%