2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the utility of “3D Slicer” as a fast and independent tool to assess intrafractional organ dose variations in gynecological brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TPS-based intra-fractional OARs dose variations are presented in Table 1 . The time required for calculating these dose variations was about 45 minutes for each patient [ 12 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TPS-based intra-fractional OARs dose variations are presented in Table 1 . The time required for calculating these dose variations was about 45 minutes for each patient [ 12 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment plans were copied manually to the second image series. New DVH parameters were recorded for OARs, and their intra-fractional dose variations were calculated as completely explained in the published paper [ 12 ]. The time required for calculating these organs dose variations of each patient was about 45 minutes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, some investigations have proposed a new strategy based on image registration to improve calculation of maximum dose to OARs. In several studies, rigid image registration (RIR) has been applied to assess dose accumulation (DA); however, the complexity of organs' deformation due to the anatomic changes and applicator insertion limits the accuracy of calculation [11,12,13]. To overcome these limitations, several deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms have been investigated [14,15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, also some open source applications have been developed for 3D reconstruction, such as 3D Slicer [1], MITK [30], DeVide [35], Invesalius 3 [25]. Among them, the most important tools are Osirix and 3D Slicer that can be used for diagnosis [14,16,22,44], surgery [7,16,32,41] and 3D reconstruction of organs for 3D printing and medical evaluation [18,31].…”
Section: D Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%