Evaluating the use of a computerized clinical decision support system for asthma by pediatric pulmonologists

Abstract

Purpose To investigate use of a new guideline-based, computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) system for asthma in a pediatric pulmonology clinic of a large academic medical center. Methods We conducted a qualitative evaluation including review of electronic data, direct observation, and interviews with all nine pediatric pulmonologists in the clinic. Outcome measures included patterns of computer use in relation to patient care, and themes surrounding the relationship between asthma care and computer use. Results The pediatric pulmonologists entered enough data to trigger the decision support system in 397/445 (89.2%) of all asthma visits from January 2009 to May 2009. However, interviews and direct observations revealed use of the decision support system was limited to documentation activities after clinic sessions ended. Reasons for delayed use reflected barriers common to general medical care and barriers specific to subspecialty care. Subspecialist-specific barriers included the perceived high complexity of patients, the impact of subject matter expertise on the types of decision support needed, and unique workflow concerns such as the need to create letters to referring physicians. Conclusions Pediatric pulmonologists demonstrated low use of a computerized decision support system for asthma care because of a combination of general and subspecialist-specific factors. Subspecialist-specific factors should not be underestimated when designing guideline-based, computerized decision support systems for the subspecialty setting.

Implementation and evaluation of an integrated computerized asthma management system in a pediatric emergency department: A randomized clinical trial

“…The asthma guideline from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)[3] focuses mainly on the outpatient environment, but includes information on care for emergency exacerbations. The most frequent approach to implementing guidelines in a clinical environment is still paper-based [6], but computer-based implementations are also used [7, 8]. Researchers have examined the benefits of paper-based and computer-based guideline implementations, but sustainable computer-based approaches in a clinical environment remain infrequent.…”

A computerized decision support tool to implement asthma guidelines for children and adolescents

“…Other investigators have developed such tools but have largely focused on implementation rather than actual effect on clinical outcomes. 27,28 Decision support tools are often unwieldy for prescribers to use because of the need to shift from paper-based to electronic-based data collection, complex interfaces, and lack of direct linkage from control assessment to suggested treatment. 9,14,29,30 An asthma decision support tool similar to the ACET Program was integrated into the EHR (EPIC) at a large children's hospital through a link to an external Internet-based program.…”

Provider-Focused Intervention to Promote Comprehensive Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis by Primary Care Pediatricians

“…Although prior studies have shown that adoption of a CCDSS may be challenging, [5][6][7] this study showed the benefit of a CCDSS. Knowing that workflow constraints and technical expertise are known barriers to CCDSS use, 8 a CCDSS was created that took into account the flow of the patient visit and need for information at the point of care. The study CCDSS helped clinicians think about appropriate exam elements and served as a refresher prior to patient evaluation.…”