2020
DOI: 10.17016/feds.2020.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Success of President Johnson's War on Poverty: Revisiting the Historical Record Using a Full-Income Poverty Measure

Abstract: We evaluate progress in President's Johnson's War on Poverty. We do so relative to the scientifically arbitrary but policy relevant 20 percent baseline poverty rate he established for 1963. No existing poverty measure fully captures poverty reductions based on the standard that President Johnson set. To fill this gap, we develop a Full-income Poverty Measure with thresholds set to match the 1963 Official Poverty Rate. We include cash income, taxes, and major in-kind transfers and update poverty thresholds for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It fell steadily for the next 30 years and has been close to 10% ever since. Compare this with the poverty rate for children, which has been close to 20% since the early 1980s (Burkhauser et al, 2019). What caused this precipitous drop in the poverty rate for seniors?…”
Section: Major Societal Changesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It fell steadily for the next 30 years and has been close to 10% ever since. Compare this with the poverty rate for children, which has been close to 20% since the early 1980s (Burkhauser et al, 2019). What caused this precipitous drop in the poverty rate for seniors?…”
Section: Major Societal Changesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Official Poverty Measure uses a family sharing unit concept, which includes all people "related by birth, marriage, or adoption and residing together" (Census Bureau, 2019). 8 But the information needed to replicate the Census Bureau's family 7 As discussed by Burkhauser et al (2019), there also has been an increase in in-kind (non-cash) transfers since the inception of the Official Poverty Measure in the 1960s. Despite the importance of these programs to the financial resources of low-income families, we do not attempt to include in-kind transfers in our poverty measures since these transfers are not captured in the tax data.…”
Section: B Income and Sharing Unit Differences From The Official Poverty Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two very recent pieces of research make the point. Burkhauser et al (2021) maintain that if one adopts the poverty standard of the original War on Poverty, accepts the Personal Consumption Expenditure index as the best measure of inflation, and employs an income measure that accounts for all benefits, poverty has been essentially eradicated, so the issue of poverty among workers is moot. On the other hand, Liu and Parilla (2021) claim that "44% of U.S. families in 2019 did not earn an income that was high enough to cover their families' living expenses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%