2014
DOI: 10.13189/ujes.2014.020302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Succeeded Rate of Reviving Identity Plans of Lost Spaces Using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (The Center of Akhoond District)

Abstract: Lost urban spaces are unique spaces inside the city which have not been used at all or significantly. In other words, they are unpleasant urban areas which have no positive relationship with surrounding environment and users in redesigning process of spaces. Hence, organization and reclamation of lost and left spaces through performance injection from resources and wealth which give identity is a part of technologies which can be experienced and tested by experts in order to provide places for presence, spendi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several assessment approaches have been developed to transform an under-bridge space into a functional public space [4] [28] [9] [29] based on physical space dimensions [30], nature of the overcome obstacle [11], the link between bridge and ground [12], traffic flow, infrastructure type, the influence of infrastructure on the superstructure, the functions and the urban impact. Some assessment approaches were quantitative, like the Analytical Hierarchy method [30] [31], and others were qualitative. However, the joint assessment was qualitative, focusing on the integration of bridge construction and the impact of developed spaces nearby by the community [4] [10] [23] [37].…”
Section: Assessment Approaches For Under-bridge Spaces Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several assessment approaches have been developed to transform an under-bridge space into a functional public space [4] [28] [9] [29] based on physical space dimensions [30], nature of the overcome obstacle [11], the link between bridge and ground [12], traffic flow, infrastructure type, the influence of infrastructure on the superstructure, the functions and the urban impact. Some assessment approaches were quantitative, like the Analytical Hierarchy method [30] [31], and others were qualitative. However, the joint assessment was qualitative, focusing on the integration of bridge construction and the impact of developed spaces nearby by the community [4] [10] [23] [37].…”
Section: Assessment Approaches For Under-bridge Spaces Designmentioning
confidence: 99%