2019
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the stoichiometric trait distributions of cultured bacterial populations and uncultured microbial communities

Abstract: Summary We measured the stoichiometric trait distribution of cultured freshwater bacterial populations under different resource conditions and compared them to natural microbial communities sampled from three lakes. Trait distributions showed population differences among growth phases and community differences among lakes that would have been masked by only reporting the mean biomass value. The stoichiometric trait distribution of the environmental isolates changed with P availability, growth phase and genotyp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This program allowed us to strip the background (continuum) radiation, subtract the contribution of the silica film from each spectra, and quantify the total counts within preselected ranges derived from biochemical standards (ATP, ADP and Acetyl-CoA, Manzella,Geiss and Hall 6 2019). We removed the control spectra from the spectra containing microbial parasite, and these values were multiplied by the previously established calibration constants (Manzella, Geiss and Hall 2019) that convert EDS output (counts per second, cps) to the amount of C, N, and P (fm) within each cell. Here we report molar ratios of C, N and P derived from these atomic cell quotas.…”
Section: Eds Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This program allowed us to strip the background (continuum) radiation, subtract the contribution of the silica film from each spectra, and quantify the total counts within preselected ranges derived from biochemical standards (ATP, ADP and Acetyl-CoA, Manzella,Geiss and Hall 6 2019). We removed the control spectra from the spectra containing microbial parasite, and these values were multiplied by the previously established calibration constants (Manzella, Geiss and Hall 2019) that convert EDS output (counts per second, cps) to the amount of C, N, and P (fm) within each cell. Here we report molar ratios of C, N and P derived from these atomic cell quotas.…”
Section: Eds Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We visually identified individual spores based on morphology and then traced them with a within system drawing tool on a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-6500F) equipped with an 80 mm 2 Oxford X-max EDS detector following the methods of Manzella et al (2019) (Figure 1). We used a grid holder that functions as a STEM converter (JU2002890, JEOL) to separate the TEM grid from the metal holder and avoid complications that have limited the use of SEM for biological samples in the past (Segura-Noguera, Blasco, & Fortuño, 2012).…”
Section: Eds Analyses Of Sporesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we present a method for analyzing the biomass stoichiometry of individual microbial parasites (spores) in individual hosts using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). This workflow was recently re‐established to characterize the stoichiometric trait distributions of freshwater planktonic communities (Manzella et al., 2019 ). Here, we explain how this technique can be adapted to quantify the stoichiometric trait distributions of parasite infrapopulations in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For plants, ectomycorrhizal fungi, and some bacteria, biomass chemical composition varies with life‐history traits (Donaldson et al ., 2006; Franklin et al ., 2011; Fernandez & Koide, 2014; Manzella et al ., 2019). For example, phenolics and N concentrations, respectively, are often negatively and positively correlated with growth rate (Franklin et al ., 2011; Siletti et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%