2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the social networks of four flocks of captive flamingos over a five-year period: Temporal, environmental, group and health influences on assortment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings conflict with previous studies where cross-fostered birds display numerous behavioural similarities to their foster species [30,31,34] and develop altered social preferences [23,39]. Instead, both foster-reared and parent-reared Chilean flamingo chicks were able to express patterns of activity and association similar to their captive and wild counterparts [47,50,51,71].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings conflict with previous studies where cross-fostered birds display numerous behavioural similarities to their foster species [30,31,34] and develop altered social preferences [23,39]. Instead, both foster-reared and parent-reared Chilean flamingo chicks were able to express patterns of activity and association similar to their captive and wild counterparts [47,50,51,71].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Wild Andean and Chilean flamingos inhabit intersecting geographical regions in South America [51,52], utilising similar wetland resources. This ecology is represented in their enclosure design at this animal collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although social networks are prone to change over time (Borgeaud et al, 2016, 2017), we found that individuals had consistent centrality in the three interaction networks from one mating season to the next (with a 6‐month interval), despite changes in group composition. High year‐to‐year consistency in centrality across years has been reported in various other species (flamingos: Phoenicopterus ruber , Frumkin et al, 2016; Rose & Croft, 2020; bighorn sheep: Ovis canadensis , Vander Wal et al (2015); ring‐tailed lemurs: Lemur catta , Kulahci et al, 2018; rhesus macaques: Macaca mulatta , Brent et al, 2013). Although we compared centralities of only individuals that were present during the two study periods, excluding juvenile male emigrants from the group and adult males that immigrated into the group, we suggest that any social reorganization of the group subsequent to these dispersal events had no major overall effects on individual centralities of stable group residents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Multiple comparison within the same animal collection provides data at the individual bird and flock-level on responses to environmental variables, as well as information on trends in behavioral performance over time. For example, the longitudinal study of social behavior and aggression within one flock of Lesser Flamingos (Phoeniconaias minor) or the study of different groups of flamingos with one animal collection to provide evidence on social networks, enclosure usage and behavioral diversity [60][61][62], provides a means of evaluating animal, temporal, seasonal and environmental influences on behavior patterns and their potential normality for that species. Collection of data across multiple individuals across multiple facilities should be the next step to such studies, encouraging the comparison and evaluation of data that shows how birds are responding to the environment provided.…”
Section: Behavior and Welfare Conserving Adaptive Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%