2015
DOI: 10.1002/joc.4333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the skill of NMME seasonal precipitation ensemble predictions for 17 hydroclimatic regions in continental China

Abstract: ABSTRACT:There is an increasing focus on the usefulness of climate model-based seasonal precipitation forecasts as inputs for hydrological applications. This study reveals that most models from the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) have potential to forecast seasonal precipitation over 17 hydroclimatic regions in continental China. In this paper, we evaluated the NMME precipitation forecast against observations. The evaluation indices included the correlation coefficient (R), relative root-mean-square… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the large volumes of data that are produced within the NMME (Table 1), global-scale studies have focused on the evaluation of model skill at specific lead times Mo and Lettenmaier, 2014), or for specific seasons (Wang, 2014), models (Jia et al, 2015;Saha et al, 2014), or climate quantities (Barnston and Lyon, 2016;Mo and Lyon, 2015). Regional evaluations of NMME forecast skill have focused principally on North America (Infanti and Kirtman, 2016), the United States (Misra and Li, 2014;Roundy et al, 2015;Slater et al, 2017), the southeastern United States , but also China (Ma et al, 2015a(Ma et al, , 2015b, Iran (Shirvani and Landman, 2016) and South Asia (Sikder et al, 2015). Thus, most of the effort of the NMME model skill evaluation has been over the USA, and far less attention has been paid to Europe, with some exceptions, such as Thober et al (2015), who used NMME forecasts as input for the mesoscale hydrologic model (mHM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the large volumes of data that are produced within the NMME (Table 1), global-scale studies have focused on the evaluation of model skill at specific lead times Mo and Lettenmaier, 2014), or for specific seasons (Wang, 2014), models (Jia et al, 2015;Saha et al, 2014), or climate quantities (Barnston and Lyon, 2016;Mo and Lyon, 2015). Regional evaluations of NMME forecast skill have focused principally on North America (Infanti and Kirtman, 2016), the United States (Misra and Li, 2014;Roundy et al, 2015;Slater et al, 2017), the southeastern United States , but also China (Ma et al, 2015a(Ma et al, , 2015b, Iran (Shirvani and Landman, 2016) and South Asia (Sikder et al, 2015). Thus, most of the effort of the NMME model skill evaluation has been over the USA, and far less attention has been paid to Europe, with some exceptions, such as Thober et al (2015), who used NMME forecasts as input for the mesoscale hydrologic model (mHM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictive skill of these equally weighted multi-models tends to be greater than or equal to the skill of the best model within the ensemble Hagedorn et al, 2005;Ma et al, 2015a;Slater et al, 2017;Thober et al, 2015;Wood et al, 2015). Generally, multi-model ensembles can outperform single-model ensembles when the individual models are overconfident, so the multi-model widens the ensemble spread and reduces the average ensemble-mean error (Weigel et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMME data have been widely used for ensemble analysis and hydroclimate forecasting Wood, 2012, 2013;Becker et al, 2014;Delsole et al, 2014;Mo and Lettenmaier, 2014;Tian et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2015]. In this study, six models, which are being implemented to produce real-time seasonal forecasts, are used for drought analysis.…”
Section: Model Forecasts and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anomaly correlation, which measures how well large (small) values of forecast indicate large (small) values of observation, has been widely used to represent the skill of GCM forecasts (e.g., Jia et al, ; Tian et al, ; Yuan, ; van den Dool et al, ; Zhao, Bennett, et al, ). While GCM forecasts are informative, their anomaly correlation exhibits spatial and temporal variation (Kirtman et al, ; Ma et al, ; Saha et al, ). That is, the anomaly correlation varies by latitude, longitude, and initialization time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%