2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Roughness According to the Tool Path Strategy When Milling Free Form Surfaces for Mold Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0
18

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to different Ra parameters, a correction factor is introduced which modifies the feed rate in order to ensure better surface roughness. de Souza et al [9] present the influence of the tool path strategy on surface quality. The different strategies result in different machining time and surface quality, which has an influence on the polishing time of the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to different Ra parameters, a correction factor is introduced which modifies the feed rate in order to ensure better surface roughness. de Souza et al [9] present the influence of the tool path strategy on surface quality. The different strategies result in different machining time and surface quality, which has an influence on the polishing time of the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that it is possible to reduce machining time up to 37% with selection of proper optimization strategy without exceeding imposed machining parameter limits. In another study, Souza et al [9] investigated the effects of different tool path strategies on surface roughness and machining time during finish milling of a mold cavity. The results showed that when compared to the less appropriate option, selection of an improved tool path strategy can decrease the machining time and machining costs by 88% and 40%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Romero et al [12] compared the ZZ and CP strategy for three different pocket geometries (concave, and convex with and without islands). For complex geometries, Ramos, Relvas, and Simões [13] compared different strategies for finishing (ZZ, CP, and radial) using the same strategies for roughing in every case, while Fagili de Souza et al [14] studied four different finishing strategies (3-D offset, spiral, radial path, and ZZ) for mold applications. Schützer, Helleno, and Castellari [15] compared a ZZ strategy (45 • ) in finishing with a mix formed by four strategies adapted to the different regions of the geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schützer, Helleno, and Castellari [15] compared a ZZ strategy (45 • ) in finishing with a mix formed by four strategies adapted to the different regions of the geometry. Normally, the studies found in the literature are focused on finishing strategies and do not analyze the influence of roughing strategies on the surface roughness obtained on the complex surface [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%