2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the robustness of models developed from field spectral data in predicting African grass foliar nitrogen concentration using WorldView-2 image as an independent test dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results showed that the addition of MCRC, NDI5, and NDSVI to the PLSR did not significantly improve the CRC estimation accuracy. Li et al [26] and Mutanga et al [27] indicated that the main spectral information (sensitive spectral bands and VIs) is sufficient to obtain high estimation accuracy, and our results were in agreement with their studies. The addition of Band2mean, Band3homogeneity, Band3dissimilarity,Band3entropy, Band3second moment, Band3correlation, and Band6mean further impoved the estimation accauracy of MRC based on Band3mean, Band4mean, and Band5mean using PLSR (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our results showed that the addition of MCRC, NDI5, and NDSVI to the PLSR did not significantly improve the CRC estimation accuracy. Li et al [26] and Mutanga et al [27] indicated that the main spectral information (sensitive spectral bands and VIs) is sufficient to obtain high estimation accuracy, and our results were in agreement with their studies. The addition of Band2mean, Band3homogeneity, Band3dissimilarity,Band3entropy, Band3second moment, Band3correlation, and Band6mean further impoved the estimation accauracy of MRC based on Band3mean, Band4mean, and Band5mean using PLSR (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Darvishzadeh et al [25] reported that using full spectral subsets or the maximum amount of spectral information available will require more computation time but is not likely to increase estimation accuracy. Moreover, several features are sufficient for obtaining the essential information to estimate LAI, nitrogen concentration, and vegetation classification [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral bands of WV-2 consist of four conventional bands (blue, green, red, and NIR1) and four additional bands (coastal blue, yellow, red edge, and a new NIR-2). Therefore, the satellite has the spectral and spatial resolutions that meet many applications like predicting and monitoring forest structural and biophysical traits at species level [73,74]. The WV-2 image was atmospherically corrected and transformed to at canopy reflectance using the Quick Atmospheric Correction (QUAC) procedure in ENVI (Environment for Visualizing Images) 4.7 software [75].…”
Section: Remotley Sensed Data and Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperspectral remote sensing of grassland has been widely used in recent studies, including the monitoring of the nutritional status, aboveground biomass (AGB) and coverage of grasslands [7][8][9][10], species recognition [11,12], and health assessments [13]. In particular, the development of estimation models and the spatial mapping of forage N, based on a wide variety of hyperspectral spectrometers and sensors, has been a popular research topic [8,14,15]. Studies have indicated that several specific known absorption bands for N, proteins, and chlorophyll (i.e., 640 nm, 910 nm, 1510 nm, and 2300 nm) can be successfully used for forage N estimation [14,[16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth period of forage has a strong correlation with the changes and distribution of N content, and it significantly affects the characteristics and morphology of the vegetation canopy spectrum. Most of the aforementioned hyperspectral parameters (i.e., VIs and absorption features) were proposed based on a specific growth period, especially the vigorous growing stage when the effect of biomass on N can be minimized [8,9]. Moreover, most studies have focused on the detection of spatial differences in forage N during a particular period without considering changes in the temporal dimension (different growth periods) [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%