2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the robustness of conceptual rainfall-runoff models under climate variability in northern Tunisia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
91
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reported that the model with the multiperiod calibration approach exhibits considerable advantages over the conventional single‐period model under variational climatic conditions. Dakhlaoui et al () assessed the robustness of three conceptual rainfall‐runoff models in five basins under long‐term climate variability. The robustness of the models was evaluated using a differential split sample to cluster the calibration period into the climate‐contrasted subperiods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reported that the model with the multiperiod calibration approach exhibits considerable advantages over the conventional single‐period model under variational climatic conditions. Dakhlaoui et al () assessed the robustness of three conceptual rainfall‐runoff models in five basins under long‐term climate variability. The robustness of the models was evaluated using a differential split sample to cluster the calibration period into the climate‐contrasted subperiods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration is the procedure adopted to obtain a set of optimal parameters and initial values that are adjusted to the particular characteristics of each basin (Dakhlaoui et al, 2017). The Nash Sutcliffe objective function -NSE [8] 130 (Wu et al, 2017) is considered a test for the goodness of fit of the hydrological prediction model, got by comparing between observed and simulated discharges (Dakhlaoui et al, 2017). Measured discharge was used as indicative variable, to be compared with model predictions of discharge, through the studied period.…”
Section: Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used for various hydrological applications in France (Grouillet et al, 2016;van Esse et al, 2013) and in other countries (Dakhlaoui et al, 2017;Seiller et al, 2017). It has shown good performances on a wide range of catchments (Coron et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discrete Gr4 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%