2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the risk of operational safety for dangerous goods in airfreights – A revised risk matrix based on fuzzy AHP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the two-dimensional risk matrix model of frequency -consequence is commonly used. Hsu et al [25] used the improved frequency-consequence matrix to evaluate the transportation safety of dangerous goods by air.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the two-dimensional risk matrix model of frequency -consequence is commonly used. Hsu et al [25] used the improved frequency-consequence matrix to evaluate the transportation safety of dangerous goods by air.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have proposed specific mathematical formulas to calculate the accident rate, damage rate, release rate, and concentration level of released dangerous goods in railway transportation [10,12], but no empirical application currently exists. In terms of the combined qualitative and quantitative approach, a popular tool is the risk matrix, which couples hazard severity levels with likelihood levels to determine a cumulative risk level based on an expert's score on each risk factor [13,14]. Another representative decision-making method combining qualitative and quantitative techniques is the analytic hierarchy process (AHP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another representative decision-making method combining qualitative and quantitative techniques is the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Different types of risk factors are identified hierarchically in the first step via qualitative analysis and then prioritized in order of importance as calculated using a quantitative method [11,14,15]. The advantage of AHP lies in the use of expert experience to quantify the relative importance of factors at different levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk matrices are easy to implement and can be implemented even where data are limited. Therefore, they have become popular decision-support tools in both the public and private sectors, (3)(4)(5)(6) in areas such as well-integrity risk, (7) drilling hazard management, (8) climatic change responses, (9) and so on. However, despite its simplicity and wide usage, recent research has revealed several flaws in the risk matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%