2022
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.106.042421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the resilience of variational quantum algorithms to leakage noise

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter include the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) [467], which is used for combinatorial optimization problems, and the Quantum K-Means Algorithm (QK-means) [468], used for clustering. These quantum variational algorithms, including the VQE, are well-suited for the NISQ era for several reasons, including their ability to cope with noise and other imperfections in current quantum hardware due to their parametric nature [469][470][471].…”
Section: Quantum Variational Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter include the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) [467], which is used for combinatorial optimization problems, and the Quantum K-Means Algorithm (QK-means) [468], used for clustering. These quantum variational algorithms, including the VQE, are well-suited for the NISQ era for several reasons, including their ability to cope with noise and other imperfections in current quantum hardware due to their parametric nature [469][470][471].…”
Section: Quantum Variational Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pursuit of large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computers, the presence of noise arising from environmental noise and imperfect hardware remains a significant challenge. [1][2][3][4]. The field of Quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] braves this challenge, offering hopeful solutions that reduce the impact of noise even in the absence of full-blown quantum error correction [14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%