2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the remodeling of condyles reconstructed by transport distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] Sagittal and comminuted condylar fractures are most likely to cause ankylosis. [6] Ankylosis of TMJ often occurs in children, and coincidentally, sagittal fracture of the condyle is the ISSN 2616-5791 Vol.5, Issue 3: 42-48, DOI: 10.25236/AJMHS.2024.050308…”
Section: Traumatic Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis and Condylar Fra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5] Sagittal and comminuted condylar fractures are most likely to cause ankylosis. [6] Ankylosis of TMJ often occurs in children, and coincidentally, sagittal fracture of the condyle is the ISSN 2616-5791 Vol.5, Issue 3: 42-48, DOI: 10.25236/AJMHS.2024.050308…”
Section: Traumatic Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis and Condylar Fra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] Studies have shown that depletion of macrophages from the time of injury or reduction of macrophage-associated inflammatory factors may affect fracture healing. [ 33] In the study of TMJA, Zhao et al [ 34] found that the number of macrophages was large in the early stage of the TMJA animal model of New Zealand rabbits. Interestingly, once the number of macrophages was inhibited during the operation of the TMJA animal model, the degree of bone stiffness could be reduced, and the expression of cartilage-related genes was also reduced.…”
Section: Osteoclasts and Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous arthroplasty and distraction (SAD) 3,35,42-52: It was first performed in 1999 by Papageorge and Apostolidis. 21 Simultaneous arthroplasty and distraction was preferred as it allowed mouth opening by fused joint resection, reduced airway resistance, reconstructed ramal height, and corrected asymmetry by lengthening of the mandible in a single surgery (Table 4). A comparison of Prearthroplasty and simultaneous distraction showed that although prearthroplasty DO provides better control of the distracting segment, but unlike simultaneous distraction, it bears a disadvantage that the final mandibular position cannot be predicted as the final mandibular position tends to change due to muscle pull after the release of ankylosis.…”
Section: Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis For Facial Deformity Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…earlystage relapse. Condylar remodeling after MDO has not been well studied, 10,11,12,13,14 and the results of experimental studies cannot be translated into the scenario in patients with deficient soft tissue and abnormal TMJ before distraction like CFM. 15,16 Unlike orthognathic surgery, the risk factors for CR after MDO are poorly evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%