Evaluating the relevance of green banking practices on Saudi Banks’ green image: The mediating effect of employees’ green behaviour

Alshebami, Ali Saleh

doi:10.1057/s41261-021-00150-8

Cited by 25 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A few studies have also employed regression, ANOVA and Chi-square method. GR-banking studies have used different supporting theories such as social responsible investment theory (Alshebami, 2021; Ibe-enwo et al, 2019; Igbudu et al, 2018; Rehman et al, 2021), UTAUT (Bouteraa et al, 2020; Iqbal et al, 2018; Nisha et al, 2020; Rifat et al, 2016), UTAUT2 (Singh & Sahu, 2021), technology acceptance model (Naruetharadhol et al, 2021; Nisha, 2020; Shrivastava et al, 2019), stakeholder theory (Nisha, 2020), attractiveness theory (Iqbal et al, 2021), perceived risk theory (Iqbal et al, 2021), theory of planned behaviour (Burhanudin et al, 2021; Taneja & Ali, 2021), theory of reasoned action (Gill et al, 2021), self-regulation theory (Burhanudin et al, 2021), corporate environmental ethics ideology (Bukhari et al, 2022) and legitimacy theory (Chen et al, 2022). A few studies on GR-banking did not refer to any theory and instead built their studies on previous literature.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Review of Green Banking Adoption: Following PRISMA Protocols

Aslam

Jawaid

2023

IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increased environmental concerns have prompted organizations, businesses and countries to act sustainably to accomplish sustainable development goals. Hence, research on Green Banking (GR-banking) has gained popularity as researchers have shown a significant interest in identifying the factors that promote the adoption of GR-banking. Considering Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), this study reviews the articles related to GR-banking adoption or intention until April 2022. The underlying objective is to analyse the studies related to GR-banking adoption or intention, research methodologies and assess the theoretical frameworks used in GR-banking adoption or intention studies. The articles were extracted through a comprehensive key search strategy from the Scopus database and Google Scholar until April 2022. The survey identified only 51 articles that directly addressed GR-banking adoption or intention, indicating a significant knowledge deficit in this field. Empirical studies on GR-banking adoption are relatively higher in number than theoretical studies. Results of this study provide key details on both empirical and theoretical studies and highlight the areas for future studies. The study further highlights that the research on GR-banking adoption or intention is in its infancy, and limited two-dimensional studies have been conducted on GR-banking adoption or intention. Moreover, current studies have not investigated performance outcomes of GR-banking besides exploring a few theories. This study offers multiple insights and identifies important research areas that need to be explored in the future to enhance sustainability and related practices in the banking industry.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Review of Green Banking Adoption: Following PRISMA Protocols

Aslam

Jawaid

2023

IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Schumpeter's Theory of Innovation GI does help protect the environment that respects the expectations of the customers (Gürlek and Tuna, 2018). Therefore, GI can be defined as the process of achieving economic growth with an aim of protecting the environment from degradation and avoiding resource exploitation (Castellacci and Lie, 2017;Alshebami, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The significance of green entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Mediating and moderating role of green innovation and green knowledge sharing culture

Guo

2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Green entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) refers to individuals’ conviction that they can contribute to solving environmental issues and shows self-assurance in their efforts to protect the environment. The present investigation attempts to determine the role of employees’ green ESE in the green innovation (GI) of SMEs. It is also proposed that GI positively impacts organizational environmental, economic, and social performance. This study also evaluates the mediating role of GI and moderating role of the green knowledge-sharing culture. This study tested the hypothesis using a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) by applying smart PLS software. A total of 289 employees from SMEs in China were targeted for data collection. The results confirmed that green ESE positively impacts GI. Additionally, the findings verified that GI positively enhances firms’ environmental, economic, and social performance. The results validate the mediating role of GI. The moderating results revealed that green knowledge-sharing culture does not play a moderating role in proposed relationships. This study serves the existing body of literature by providing empirical evidence on the significance of green ESE. The study outcomes highlighted the bridging role of employees’ green ESE for firms’ GI. The results also offer companies a road map for how staff members’ green ESE might help the businesses to improve their performance in terms of the environment, economy, and society.

show abstract

“…For example, as a touchless means of online transactions between customers and banks, mobile payment services reduce the possibility of COVID-19's infection in the Indian market (Upadhyay et al ., 2022). Thus, utilizing the green marketing perspective could create a green brand image as consumers care about safety, thereby leading to a positive perception toward the brand at large (Alshebami, 2021).…”

Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Being “green” to trust and continue in a global pandemic

Thao¹,

Tran

2022

IJBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeGiven the severe impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on bank business activities, this study aims to examine how green brand image and online trust affect customers' continuance intention (CI) under the boundary condition of perceived effectiveness of e-services (PEES).Design/methodology/approachAn extensive review of the green marketing perspective was conducted to identify the incremental contributions of the current study (e.g. extensions of online trust and PEES). The authors used the common questionnaire survey strategy for the data collection while applying the partial least squares technique for further analyses.FindingsUsing data from 460 bank customers, the findings indicated that online trust positively mediates the relationship between green brand image and CI under the moderating effect of PEES. At high levels of PEES, online trust exerts strongest effect on customers' CI.Research limitations/implicationsThis study responds to the emerging call for understanding the PEES role, under which online trust leads to CI in the context of the global pandemic.Practical implicationsThe authors provide bank managers with a helpful extension of green marketing with PEES to manage online trust and customer intention, thereby increasing the managers' strategic effectiveness.Originality/valueThe current study explores the moderating role of PEES that plays in the green brand image, online trust and CI relationships, in responding to the pandemic situation.

show abstract

Evaluating the relevance of green banking practices on Saudi Banks’ green image: The mediating effect of employees’ green behaviour

Cited by 25 publications

References 44 publications

Systematic Review of Green Banking Adoption: Following PRISMA Protocols

Systematic Review of Green Banking Adoption: Following PRISMA Protocols

The significance of green entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Mediating and moderating role of green innovation and green knowledge sharing culture

Being “green” to trust and continue in a global pandemic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About