2020
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the relationships between the legal and illegal international wildlife trades

Abstract: The international legal trade in wildlife can provide economic and other benefits, but when unsustainable can be a driver of population declines. This impact is magnified by the additional burden of illegal trade, yet how it covaries with legal trade remains little explored. We combined law-enforcement time-series of seizures of wildlife goods imported into the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) with data on reported legal trade to evaluate the evidence for any relationships. Our analysis examined … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the reported live primate trade in the UN Comtrade Database resembles the international trade in long-tailed macaques. If legal trade mirrors illegal trade, and for example 28% is added to the volume of legal trade through confiscations in the US alone (Tittensor et al, 2020), the magnitude we present here only presents a fraction of the true trade. The reports of the Species Survival Commission furthermore discuss that laundering wild-caught long-tailed macaques as captive bred is a reoccurring event indicating that a portion of the legal trade presented here is actually illegal (SSN, 2012(SSN, , 2015a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This means that the reported live primate trade in the UN Comtrade Database resembles the international trade in long-tailed macaques. If legal trade mirrors illegal trade, and for example 28% is added to the volume of legal trade through confiscations in the US alone (Tittensor et al, 2020), the magnitude we present here only presents a fraction of the true trade. The reports of the Species Survival Commission furthermore discuss that laundering wild-caught long-tailed macaques as captive bred is a reoccurring event indicating that a portion of the legal trade presented here is actually illegal (SSN, 2012(SSN, , 2015a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One issue pertaining to the illegal or unsustainable global wildlife trade is the lack of effective governance and law enforcement. Actors who belong to transnational networks with links to political and economic elites frequently exploit regulatory loopholes, using formal channels to trade wildlife products illegally (Hübschle 2017 ; Tittensor et al 2020 ). Weak and ineffective law enforcement with few repercussions from authorities also exacerbate the occurrence of poaching and illicit sales and possessions in protected wildlife species (Freund et al 2017 ).…”
Section: The Application Of the Framework To The Global Wildlife Tradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wildlife trafficking is increasingly recognized as both a specialized area of organized crime and a significant threat to many plant and animal species [2,34,35]. However, due to its intrinsic illegal nature, it is difficult to fully know its actual extent and consequences for wildlife [12,36]. Here, we provide the first reliable and simultaneous large-scale estimation of poaching pressure and abundance in the wild of a community of parrot species, showing that poaching of this taxonomic group is not opportunistic, but largely focused on species with particular traits that make them more attractive to people.…”
Section: Parrot Poaching Is Not An Opportunistic But a Selective Wilmentioning
confidence: 99%