2015
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the regional cumulative impact of wind farms on birds: how can spatially explicit dynamic modelling improve impact assessments and monitoring?

Abstract: Summary1. The Eurasian skylark Alauda arvensis is very susceptible to the negative effects of wind farms. In northern Portugal, this evidence is particularly severe due to the skylark's preference for mountain breeding habitats where most wind farms are located. Facing the frequent failure of environmental impact assessments (EIA) to evaluate the cumulative impacts of wind farms on wildlife, this study aimed to develop and test a methodology to quantify local and regional consequences on birds, using skylarks … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…General application Examples Specific issues Examples Conservation Identification of priority areas for bird conservation Guisan et al 2013, Frick et al 2014 Seabirds and marine environments Lavers et al 2014 Identifying protected areas to meet specific targets Naoe et al 2015 Identifying no-go areas to reduce human-wildlife conflicts in wind power planning Reid et al 2015 Identifying specific habitats for certain species needs Brambilla and Saporetti 2014 Validating umbrella species to match conservation goals Fourcade et al 2017 Evaluating or forecasting the effect of environmental changes Green et al 2008 Future effectiveness of protected areas over different spatial scales Coetzee et al 2009, Hole et al 2009, Veloz et al 2013, Virkkala et al 2013, Brambilla et al 2015 Kissling 2013, Tracewski et al 2016 Including changes in demography Haché et al 2016 Including nest predation and food limitation Harris et al 2012 Including wind farm construction Bastos et al 2016 Invasive birds Predictions of invasion risk Muñoz and Real 2006, Nyári et al 2006, Real et al 2008, Strubbe and Matthysen 2009, Herrando et al 2010, Di Febbraro and Mori 2015, Fraser et al 2015 Range dynamics under climate change Huntley et al 2007, Reino et al 2009, Graham et al 2011 (Continued) …”
Section: Topicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…General application Examples Specific issues Examples Conservation Identification of priority areas for bird conservation Guisan et al 2013, Frick et al 2014 Seabirds and marine environments Lavers et al 2014 Identifying protected areas to meet specific targets Naoe et al 2015 Identifying no-go areas to reduce human-wildlife conflicts in wind power planning Reid et al 2015 Identifying specific habitats for certain species needs Brambilla and Saporetti 2014 Validating umbrella species to match conservation goals Fourcade et al 2017 Evaluating or forecasting the effect of environmental changes Green et al 2008 Future effectiveness of protected areas over different spatial scales Coetzee et al 2009, Hole et al 2009, Veloz et al 2013, Virkkala et al 2013, Brambilla et al 2015 Kissling 2013, Tracewski et al 2016 Including changes in demography Haché et al 2016 Including nest predation and food limitation Harris et al 2012 Including wind farm construction Bastos et al 2016 Invasive birds Predictions of invasion risk Muñoz and Real 2006, Nyári et al 2006, Real et al 2008, Strubbe and Matthysen 2009, Herrando et al 2010, Di Febbraro and Mori 2015, Fraser et al 2015 Range dynamics under climate change Huntley et al 2007, Reino et al 2009, Graham et al 2011 (Continued) …”
Section: Topicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, SDMs have been used to quantify species' extinction risk by estimating changing habitat availability (Tracewski et al 2016) -partly by taking into account additional information on demography, nest predation, and food limitation (Harris et al 2012, Kissling 2013, Haché et al 2016. In conjunction with long-term ecological research and monitoring studies, such approaches hold strong potential to assess impacts of many aspects of anthropogenic environmental change or in the context of environmental planning (Bastos et al 2016). To this end, data from longterm monitoring projects have been shown to provide useful information for predicting trends in bird distributions using SDMs, representing an important supplement to atlas data .…”
Section: Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study represents an early step to support strategic options for impact mitigation and management by providing projections of long-term indicator trends under realistic social-ecological change scenarios (Bastos et al, 2015). Although the projections recreates realistically the known cork oak regeneration patters occurring in montado regions, some limitations arise when considering validation as a fundamental process to assess the relative accuracy of the model response facing independent real data (Rykiel, 1996).…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecological modelling provides useful tools to study complex systems by predicting the outcome of alternative scenarios, and might help guiding the most correct management options from projected future outcomes (e.g. Bastos et al, 2012Bastos et al, , 2015Fernandes et al, 2013;Santos et al, 2013). Actually dynamic models can be used to support the mechanistic understanding of complex multifactorial ecological processes as they simultaneously integrate the structure and the composition of systems for a specific period (Jørgensen, 1994(Jørgensen, , 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To adequately characterize the impact of a proposed development or activity on a particular species, it is necessary to identify the relevant local population which may be impacted (Brittingham et al, 2014;Bastos et al, 2016;Brown et al, 2016). In highly fragmented landscapes, the relevant local population may be straightforward to delineate because of the geographical separation between the area affected by the development and the nearest other sites where the species may be found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%