2023
DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2208216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines from network-meta analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the 2.4–3.4% of unexpected splicing events we observed for the C1 and C62 transcriptomes in this work. Since its first use, over 2 billion doses of the ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 vaccine have been administered, particularly in India, South America and Africa, without any reported evidence that rare aberrant splice variants of the spike transcript caused ill effects in vaccine recipients [ 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to the 2.4–3.4% of unexpected splicing events we observed for the C1 and C62 transcriptomes in this work. Since its first use, over 2 billion doses of the ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 vaccine have been administered, particularly in India, South America and Africa, without any reported evidence that rare aberrant splice variants of the spike transcript caused ill effects in vaccine recipients [ 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major challenges for the current mRNA vaccine formulations is vaccine reactogenicity. Many vaccinees have experienced mild to severe systemic adverse effects such as fever, chills and joint pains (reviewed in 1,2 ). Although the precise mechanisms that underlie severe systemic adverse effects are not yet known, it is assumed that excessive innate immune reactions to components of vaccines causes these adverse effects 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%