2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00580-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the quality of self-reports of hypertension and diabetes

Abstract: Increasingly, researchers and health specialists are obtaining information on chronic illnesses from self-reports. This study validates self-reports of two major health conditions, hypertension and diabetes, based on a recent survey in Taiwan (SEBAS 2000). These data, based on a large, nationally representative sample of respondents aged 54 and older, include both self-reported health information and a physical examination. Average blood pressure readings, laboratory measures of glycosylated hemoglobin, and in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

27
275
2
15

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(14 reference statements)
27
275
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the validity of self-reported diabetes was proven to be highly accurate in the U.S. 27 , and the validity of self-reported weight and height for calculating BMI was acceptable as an epidemiologic tool, 28,29 there is increasing evidence that the accuracy of self-reported weight and height tends to vary by self-reporter characteristics. 30,31 For example, obese persons tend to under-report their weight while underweight persons tend to overestimate it; thus, our BMI change trajectories in adults with diabetes may be afflicted with "regression to the mean."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the validity of self-reported diabetes was proven to be highly accurate in the U.S. 27 , and the validity of self-reported weight and height for calculating BMI was acceptable as an epidemiologic tool, 28,29 there is increasing evidence that the accuracy of self-reported weight and height tends to vary by self-reporter characteristics. 30,31 For example, obese persons tend to under-report their weight while underweight persons tend to overestimate it; thus, our BMI change trajectories in adults with diabetes may be afflicted with "regression to the mean."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selfreports run the risk of false-positive and false-negative diagnoses. With regard to diabetes, however, recent studies comparing patients' self-reports with physicians' diagnoses have reported moderate to high agreement rates, lowering the risk of misclassification bias [58][59][60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another alternative is the use of self-reported information that is obtained quickly and at a low cost, enabling their adoption in populational studies. However, owing to some biases -lack of knowledge on the information of interest by the respondent, memory bias, and the desire not to inform the prevalence of the disease or the fact that it is still not diagnosed -there is the need of assessing the reliability of the self-reported diabetes 13,14 . Given the above-mentioned scenario, the objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of the factors associated with self-reported diabetes in elderly population and verify the correlation between DM medication and the information about the disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%